Page 217 - Read Online
P. 217

Riaz et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2018;2:28  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2018.41                                              Page 7 of 8


               Table 1. Dominant vs. non-dominant hand, baseline and final results in both groups
               Task: performing hand   Assessment stage      Groups          Mean ± 2 sem       t-test
                                                            Control           0.94 ± 0.09
                                         Baseline           Mental Training   1.07 ± 0.14       P = 0.4
               Dominant hand
                                                            Control           1.06 ± 0.14
                                         Final                                                  P = 0.01
                                                            Mental Training   0.66 ± 0.04
                                                            Control           1.10 ± 0.12
                                         Baseline                                               P = 0.8
                                                            Mental Training   1.04 ± 0.12
               Non-dominant hand                            Control           1.10 ± 0.20
                                         Final                                                  P = 0.04
                                                            Mental Training   0.73 ± 0.04



                             1.75                                              Control
                                                                               Mental training
                             1.50
                                                                              = P < 0.05 vs. Control
                         Final task (kg)  1.00
                             1.25






                             0.75


                             0.50

                                       Dominat             Non-dominat
                                                  Hand
                                  Figure 7. Mean ± sem Final task (kg), control vs. mental training, 95% CI

               were consistent, indicating that under-traction will be more likely to happen than over-traction. Inferring
               from the data, iatrogenic tearing of tissue is less likely to occur in the mental training group. Accuracy
               remained an issue in control group in the form of over traction for both dominant and non dominant
               hands [Figure 7].


               The method used to conduct this pilot study was based on simple principles of learning, training and
               observing the effects. Baseline and final assessments allowed an objective measure of each candidate’s
               performance on a general scale. The simplistic nature of the study meant that the number of variables
               which could affect the results and create bias were limited. Aside from the technical challenges, the main
               improvement to this experiment would be to utilise a blindfold to allow complete exclusion of the visual
               senses during training. This study also highlighted the need for future research studies to understand
               required pulling target force for each part of human tissue. This knowledge could potentially be translated
               in developing new haptic communication in laparoscopic instruments.



               DECLARATIONS
               Author’s contributions
               Concept: Shariffudin AM, Alijani A, Riaz MK
               Data collection, compilation: Shariffuddin AM, Riaz MK, Tang B
               Manuscript writing: Riaz MK, Shariffuddin AM
   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222