Page 48 - Read Online
P. 48

Page 6 of 9             Scardino et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:57  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2022.55

                                                                               [34]
               rigid endoscopy represent limitations of the transoral stapling technique . Both Z-POEM and Z-POES
               appear safe and effective and may prove superior to the standard flexible endoscopy technique because they
               provide direct exposure of the cricopharyngeal muscle and allow performing single-stage cricopharyngeal
               myotomy with pouch remodeling. This may translate into a reduction of anatomical and symptomatic
               recurrences and lower reintervention rates.

               A complete cricopharyngeal myotomy is the cornerstone of both surgical and endoscopic approaches. From
               the flexible endoscopic perspective, the buccopharyngeal fascia represents an important safety landmark.
               This thin structure is displaced posteriorly by the diverticulum, and its preservation may guarantee a
               complete myotomy without risks. However, it must be kept in mind that the cricopharyngeus is a circular
               muscle lacking an external layer of longitudinal muscle and perforation of the buccopharyngeal fascia may
                                  [35]
               result in mediastinitis . In real-world practice, it is challenging to identify a precise visual cue confirming
               that the myotomy is complete without breaking the fascia and entering the prevertebral space. Often, the
               trade-off to minimize the risk of perforation during standard FES is to plan a multi-stage procedure. With
               Z-POEM, identification of the buccopharyngeal fascia at the bottom of the pouch remains difficult during
               submucosal tunneling, but avoiding the posterior approach may further reduce the risk of perforation .
                                                                                                    [36]

               Management of ZD requires an interdisciplinary and cooperative approach. Multiple specialists (surgeons,
               gastroenterologists, and otolaryngologists) may be involved in the decision-making process to deliver the
               best care to the patient. Nowadays, indications for an open surgical approach have become rare. In our
               opinion, large ZD (> 3 cm) can be safely treated with endostapling, while smaller ZD can be treated with
               FES or Z-POES. Recurrent ZD can be safely treated with either transoral or open approach .
                                                                                           [37]
               CONCLUSIONS
               Peroral endoscopic myotomy techniques have opened a new era in the management of patients with ZD.
               However, appropriate training in advanced operative endoscopy remains critical, and high-quality studies
               with long-term and standardized patient-reported outcomes are necessary to validate these promising
               clinical findings.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Siboni S, Bonavina L
               Performed data acquisition: Milito P, Scardino A

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53