Page 42 - Read Online

Page 6 of 6 Bitner et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:46 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2022.46

14. Petric J, Bright T, Liu DS, Wee Yun M, Watson DI. Sutured versus mesh-augmented hiatus hernia repair: a systematic review and
meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Annals of Surgery 2022;275:e45-51. DOI PubMed
15. Rausa E, Manfredi R, Kelly ME, et al. Prosthetic reinforcement in hiatal hernia repair, does mesh material matter? J Laparoendosc
Adv Surg Tech A 2021;31:1118-23. DOI PubMed
16. Campos V, Palacio DS, Glina F, Tustumi F, Bernardo WM, Sousa AV. Laparoscopic treatment of giant hiatal hernia with or without
mesh reinforcement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2020;77:97-104. DOI PubMed
17. Memon MA, Siddaiah-Subramanya M, Yunus RM, Memon B, Khan S. Suture cruroplasty versus mesh hiatal herniorrhaphy for large
hiatal hernias (HHS): an updated meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan
Tech 2019;29:221-32. DOI PubMed
18. Sathasivam R, Bussa G, Viswanath Y, et al. “Mesh hiatal hernioplasty” versus “suture cruroplasty” in laparoscopic para-oesophageal
hernia surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 2019;42:53-60. DOI PubMed
19. Zhang C, Liu D, Li F, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic mesh versus suture repair of hiatus hernia: objective
and subjective outcomes. Surg Endosc 2017;31:4913-22. DOI PubMed PMC
20. Memon MA, Memon B, Yunus RM, Khan S. Suture cruroplasty versus prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia: a meta-
analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2016;263:258-66. DOI PubMed
21. Tam V, Winger DG, Nason KS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of mesh vs suture cruroplasty in laparoscopic large hiatal
hernia repair. The American Journal of Surgery 2016;211:226-38. DOI PubMed PMC
22. Huddy JR, Markar SR, Ni MZ, et al. Laparoscopic repair of hiatus hernia: does mesh type influence outcome? Surg Endosc
2016;30:5209-21. DOI PubMed
23. Antoniou SA, Müller-Stich BP, Antoniou GA, et al. Laparoscopic augmentation of the diaphragmatic hiatus with biologic mesh versus
suture repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2015;400:577-83. DOI PubMed
24. Müller-stich BP, Kenngott HG, Gondan M, et al. Use of mesh in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a meta-analysis and risk-
benefit analysis. PLoS ONE 2015;10:e0139547. DOI PubMed PMC
25. Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Lower recurrence rates after mesh-reinforced versus simple hiatal
hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22:498-502. DOI PubMed
26. Watson DI, Thompson SK, Devitt PG, et al. Five year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic repair of very large
hiatus hernia with sutures versus absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh. Ann Surg 2020;272:241-7. DOI PubMed
27. Analatos A, Håkanson BS, Lundell L, Lindblad M, Thorell A. Tension-free mesh versus suture-alone cruroplasty in antireflux surgery:
a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Br J Surg 2020;107:1731-40. DOI PubMed
28. Ilyashenko VV, Grubnyk VV, Grubnik VV. Laparoscopic management of large hiatal hernia: mesh method with the use of ProGrip
mesh versus standard crural repair. Surg Endosc 2018;32:3592-8. DOI PubMed
29. Oor JE, Roks DJ, Koetje JH, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair using sutures versus sutures
reinforced with non-absorbable mesh. Surg Endosc 2018;32:4579-89. DOI PubMed
30. Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter JG, et al. Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia
repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Journal of the American College of Surgeons
2011;213:461-8. DOI PubMed
31. Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Kamolz T, Asche KU, Pointner R. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure
reduces postoperative intrathoracic wrap herniation preliminary results of a prospective randomized functional and clinical study. Arch
Surg 2005;140:40-8. DOI PubMed
32. Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA, Stavropoulos GP. A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene
(PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg 2002;137:649-52. DOI PubMed
33. Tam V, Luketich JD, Levy RM, et al. Mesh cruroplasty in laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias is not associated with better
long-term outcomes compared to primary repair. Am J Surg 2017;214:651-6. DOI
34. Armijo PR, Krause C, Xu T, Shostrom V, Oleynikov D. Surgical and clinical outcomes comparison of mesh usage in laparoscopic
hiatal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2021;35:2724-30. DOI PubMed
35. Müller-Stich BP, Linke GR, Senft J, et al. Laparoscopic mesh-augmented hiatoplasty with cardiophrenicopexy versus laparoscopic
Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a double-center randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg
2015;262:721-5; discussion 725. DOI PubMed
36. Desai AA, Alemayehu H, Dalton BG, et al. Review of the experience with re-operation after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 2016;26:140-3. DOI PubMed
37. Spiro C, Quarmby N, Gananadha S. Mesh-related complications in paraoesophageal repair: a systematic review. Surg Endosc
2020;34:4257-80. DOI PubMed