Page 94 - Read Online
P. 94

Nakamura et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:50  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2022.38  Page 15 of 20

               Table 5. Risk factors for Intraoperative perforation of gastric ESD
                Risk factors
                Location of the lesion (the corpus, the greater curvature, and remnant stomach)
                Large (> 20 mm) tumor size
                Submucosal tumor invasion or beyond
                Submucosal fibrosis
                Elevated morphology
                Long procedure time
                Piecemeal resection
                Prior workload of operators

               ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection.



























                Figure 9. Management of perforation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). OTSC: Over the scope clip; PGA:
                polyglycolic acid; CT: computed tomography.

               In cases of delayed perforation, the management is similar to that of intraoperative perforation. The
               difference may lie in the high comorbidity rate of pan-peritonitis in delayed perforation cases and friability
               of the tissues around the perforation hole, which may make simple clip closure difficult. Patients with
               delayed perforation who recovered with conservative management mostly developed adverse events (AE)
               before dietary intake and/or received endoscopic intervention within 24 h after onset [73,75] .

               Stenosis
               A three-quarter circumferential resection is a risk factor for stenosis following gastric ESD. Prophylactic
               intralesional steroid injection and/or oral steroids have been reported, but their effectiveness for gastric
               stricture has not been fully verified. The main management method for gastric stenosis is endoscopic
               balloon dilation (EBD). Some observational studies indicated that one of the important risk factors for
               stenosis after gastric ESD in both the cardia and the pylorus was the size of the circumferential resection
               defect, which is often greater than three-fourths in extent [81-85] .


               The methods and efficacy of gastric stenosis prevention are controversial. One study reported that
                                                                                  [82]
               prophylactic EBD was effective in reducing the total number of EBD sessions . A small study suggested
               combination treatment with oral and injectable steroids had preventative effects against gastric stenosis .
                                                                                                       [86]
               Three studies that investigated stenosis after pyloric ESD indicated the effectiveness of prophylactic EBD for
               the prevention of pyloric stenosis, but steroid injection was ineffective in one of four cases. Some reports
               described the use of a steroid (triamcinolone) solution for submucosal injection during ESD [87,88] . For the
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99