Page 11 - Read Online
P. 11

Hayes et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:56                     Mini-invasive Surgery
               DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2021.126



               Perspective                                                                   Open Access



               Has robotic prostatectomy determined the fall of the

               laparoscopic approach?


                                       1,2
                         1
               John Hayes , Nikhil Vasdev , Prokar Dasgupta 3
               1
                Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage SG1 4AB, UK.
               2
                School of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9EU, UK.
               3
                Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Nikhil Vasdev, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage SG1
               4AB, UK. E-mail: nikhil.vasdev@nhs.net
               How to cite this article: Hayes J, Vasdev N, Dasgupta P. Has robotic prostatectomy determined the fall of the laparoscopic
               approach? Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:56. https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.126
               Received: 3 Nov 2021  First Decision: 24 Nov 2021  Revised: 3 Dec 2021  Accepted: 14 Dec 2021  Published: 25 Dec 2021

               Academic Editors: Enrico Checcucci, Riccardo Autorino  Copy Editor: Xi-Jun Chen  Production Editor: Xi-Jun Chen

               Abstract
               Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has revolutionised the surgical management of localised
               prostate cancer in the modern era. The surgeon is provided with greater precision, more versatile dexterity and an
               immersive three-dimensional visual field. The impressive hardware facilitates, for example, the dissection of the
               peri-prostatic  fascia,  whilst  preserving  the  neurovascular  bundle,  or  the  suturing  of  the  vesico-urethral
               anastomosis. Prior to RALP, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) represented the first venture into the
               minimally invasive world. Associated with more cumbersome ergonomics, LRP has a significant learning curve
               compared with the robotic approach. There has been a paucity, until recently, of high-quality literature comparing
               outcomes between the two operations, including the attainment of the Pentafecta of survivorship: biochemical
               recurrence-free, continence, potency, no postoperative complications and negative surgical margins.

               Keywords: Prostate cancer, robotic, prostatectomy, laparoscopic



               Today, the majority of men with intermediate or high-risk localised prostate cancer, who are candidates for
               surgical intervention, will undergo a robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). The robot has
               firmly cemented itself as the modality of choice for both patients and urologists.









                           © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing,
                           adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as
               long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and
               indicate if changes were made.

                                                                                            www.misjournal.net
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16