Page 65 - Read Online
P. 65

Page 4 of 5               Smith et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:34  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.44

               Table 2. Patient demographics and comorbidities of patients presenting with strangulated groin hernias repaired by trans-abdominal
               preperitoneal mesh repair with concomitant small bowel resection
                  Age,                     Cardiac     Pulmonary   Other
                Pt      Sex ASA Smoker BMI                               Deceased Cause of death
                  years                    history     history   history
                A 57    F  2    Current  20.80 HTN     COPD              No
                B  68   F  2    Never  20.97                             No
                C 83    F  3    Former  22.08 HTN                CVA     Yes     Died in hospice from upper
                                                                                 gastrointestinal hemorrhage 5 years
                                                                                 later
                D 93    F  3    Never  22.03 HTN, CAD,                   Yes     Died 2 years postoperatively, cause
                                           pacemaker,                            not listed
                                           CABG
                E  92   M  4    Unknown 18.64 HTN, CAD,   COPD,   Dementia  Yes  Readmitted 6 weeks postoperatively
                                           pacemaker, IHD  pulmonary             and died from CHF exacerbation and
                                                       HTN                       MRSA cellulitis
                F  85   F  4    Current  19.93 HTN, atrial   COPD        Yes     Died 3 years later from complications
                                           fibrillation                          from CVA
                G 62    F  1    Never  22.50                             no
                H 75    F  2    Former  26.25 HTN                        No
                I  85   F  3    Never  17.47                             No
               Pt: Patient; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification; BMI: body mass index; F: female; M: male; HTN:
               hypertension; CAD: coronary artery disease; CABG: coronary artery bypass graft; IHD: ischemic heart disease; COPD: chronic obstructive
               pulmonary disease; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; CHF: congestive heart failure; MRSA: methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

               This case series supports the use of laparoscopic TAPP repair for strangulated groin hernias. In our
               experience, TAPP is a safe approach with concomitant bowel resection, as long as frank perforation with
               gross spillage of succus does not occur. Similar recurrence rates are generally seen between the open and
               laparoscopic approaches, and some argue decreased complications with the laparoscopic method. TAPP
               gives the ability to reduce the hernia under direct visualization while permitting assessment of bowel
               viability in real time. Further, in the laparoscopic approach, the mesh covers the direct, indirect and femoral
               spaces, theoretically preventing future herniation through the other spaces, which is not always the case in
               open approaches.


               Ultimately, the surgeon should choose the repair with which he or she is most comfortable and familiar. As
               surgeons become more facile with laparoscopic repair, it should be considered for incarcerated hernias due
               to the benefits of more complete bowel assessment for viability, reduced pain, time to recovery, and hospital
               stay.

               Conclusion
               Strangulated groin hernia is a rare medical emergency that warrants rapid operative repair. The best method
               of repair in this setting is not well defined, but laparoscopic repair with mesh appears to be a safe and
               effective option, even when bowel resection is performed. The authors support the use of laparoscopic
               repair if it fits the experience and comfort of the surgeon.

               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Smith A, Hope W, Fox S
               Performed data acquisition, as well as provided administrative, technical, and material support: Bilezikian J,
               Hope W
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70