Page 6 - Read Online
P. 6

Gharagozloo et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:57                Mini-invasive Surgery
               DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2020.44




               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Technique of robotic lobectomy III: control of major
               vascular injury, the 5 “P”’s



               Farid Gharagozloo, Mark Meyer

               Center for Advanced Thoracic Surgery, Global Robotics Institute, Advent Health Celebration, University of Central Florida,
               Celebration, FL 34786, USA.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Farid Gharagozloo, Center for Advanced Thoracic Surgery, Global Robotics Institute, Advent Health
               Celebration, University of Central Florida, 400 Celebration Place, Celebration, FL 34786, USA.
               E-mail: farid.gharagozloo.md@adventhealth.com
               How to cite this article: Gharagozloo F, Meyer M. Technique of robotic lobectomy III: control of major vascular injury, the 5 “P”’s.
               Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:57. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.44
               Received: 29 Apr 2020    First Decision: 8 Jun 2020    Revised: 8 Jun 2020    Accepted: 24 Jun 2020    Published: 1 Sep 2020

               Academic Editor: Giulio Belli, Noriyoshi Sawabata    Copy Editor: Cai-Hong Wang    Production Editor: Jing Yu



               Abstract
               Robotic Lobectomy has been evolving over the past decade and has been shown to be an oncologically efficacious
               procedure. Although robotic lobectomy is performed more frequently in centers around the world, it accounts
               for a small percentage of all lobectomies. One of the major causes of reluctance to adopt robotic lobectomy and
               segmentectomy procedures by surgeons is the fear of bleeding complications, as well as the lack of a standardized
               reproducible approach to these potentially catastrophic events. This paper outlines a proven strategy for control
               of bleeding complications during robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy procedures: the 5 “P”’s of Prevention,
               Preparedness, Poise, Pressure, and Proximal Control.

               Keywords: Robotic, lobectomy, bleeding, upper lobectomy, middle lobectomy, lower lobectomy, lobectomy,
               conversion, lung cancer, 5 “P”’s




               INTRODUCTION
               Although robotic lobectomy is performed more frequently in centers around the world, it accounts for a
               small percentage of all lobectomies. One of the determinants for the lower level of adoption of the robotic
               lobectomy and segmentectomy procedures is concern about catastrophic bleeding complications, as well as
               a reproducible strategy for the control of bleeding.



                           © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                     www.misjournal.net
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11