Page 12 - Read Online
P. 12

Cosgun et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2019;3:32  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2019.024                                       Page 5 of 9

               Table 2. Type of minimal invasive surgery and effects of surgical technique on lymph nodes
                                                 RATS 83               VATS 75              P value
                N of dissected LN/patients       23.3 ± 11.3           16.3 ± 10.2          P < 0.05
                N of positive LN/patients        1.2 ± 2.6             0.3 ± 0.8            P = 0.06
                N status
                   N2                            14 (17%)              7 (9.3%)
                   N1                            7 (8.4%)              4 (5.3%)             P = 0.13
                   N0                            62 (74.7%)            64 (85.3%)
               N: number; LN: lymph node; RATS: robot assisted thoracoscopic surgery; VATS: videoassited thoracoscopic surgery; N status: nodal
               status (P value was derived from ANOVA test)

               Table 3. Effects of T factor on nodal status and positivity of lymph nodes
                                                     T1                       T2            T3
                                          T1a       T1b       T1c       T2a       T2b       T3     P value
                Number of patients     11        69         28       23         11        16
                   N0                  8%-72.7%  56%-81.2%  22%-78.6%  18%-78.26% 10%-90.1%  12%-75%
                   N1                  1%-9%     5%-7.3%    1%-3.6%  3%-13%     1%-9%     0        P > 0.05
                   N2                  2%-18%    8%-13.3%   5%-17.8%  2%-8.6%   0         4%-25%
                Number of positive lymph nodes  6  46       23       20         1         21       P > 0.05
                Rate of positive lymph nodes  0.03  0.045   0.034    0.03       0.033     0.042    P > 0.05
               P value was derived from ANOVA test

               had multifocal tumors. Mean tumor size was 2.8 ± 1.9 cm (range, 0.6-11; 2.9 ± 2 in the RATS and 2.6 ± 1.8
               in the VATS groups; P = 0.4).

               Lymph nodes
               The most commonly dissected lymph nodes were those at stations 5-7, 10, and 11 for left-sided tumors, and
               at stations 2R, 4R, and 7-11 for right-sided tumors. Mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 20.0 ± 11.3
               (range, 1-57).

               Among all patients, the nodal status was N2 in 21 (13.3%), N1 in 11 (7%), and N0 in 126 (79.%). Total
               upstaging rate in all groups was 20.3%.


               Nodal status and number of positive lymph nodes were evaluated with the Mann-Whitney U test for stages
               T1 vs. T2 (P = 0.79, P = 0.77), T1 vs. T3 (P = 0.32, P = 0.36), and T2 vs. T3 (P = 0.29, P = 0.39) disease. All
               differences were statistically insignificant. Nodal status and number of positive lymph nodes also were not
               statistically significant when comparing the three stage (T1, T2, T3) groups via ANOVA [Table 3].

               Subgroups of T status (T1a, T1b, T1c, T2a, T2b, and T3) were compared and they had similar numbers of
               positive lymph nodes, positive lymph node ratios, and similar nodal status [Table 3].

               Histopathology
               Lymphovascular and visceral pleural invasions are the most commonly investigated histopathologic
               parameters. A total of 77 patients had lymphovascular and 34 had visceral pleural invasion. When
               analyzed, the effect of visceral pleural invasion on lymph node positivity was not significant (P = 0.29).
               However, lymphovascular invasion tended to be significantly related to lymph node positivity (P = 0.08).


               Histologic tumor grade was classified according to differentiation: 16 patients had grade 1, 86 grade 2, and
               41 grade 3 disease. There was no correlation between differentiation grade and lymph node positivity (P =
               0.86) and N status (P = 0.79).
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17