Page 51 - Read Online
P. 51

Genova et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:2  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2019.30                                         Page 7 of 8


               of which are represented by time of robotic setting, lack of both tactile sensation and tension feedback, and
                        [35]
               high costs .

               Robot docking and collisions among instruments partially explain the longer operating time frequently
               reported for robotic surgery, but an experienced team may overcome this limitation, as can the
               implementation of the latest technological innovations. The latter might also allow overcoming the absence
               of tactile feedback of robotic systems, currently partially arranged by means of the ameliorated view they
                      [35]
               provide .

               For what concerns high costs, it can to be remarked that the implementation of conventional laparoscopy
               was also very expensive at the beginning, but it provided a number of advantages in terms of postoperative
               outcomes, which justified its spread. Clearly, the implementation of robotic surgery is more expensive, but
                                                                                               [35]
               the evaluation of eventual clear benefits for patients and surgeons could motivate its use as well .
               CONCLUSION
               The implementation of robotic technology in general surgery represented the inevitable outlet of an
               astonishing technological development. It has proved to be feasible and safe, with several operating
               advantages for surgeons. However, clear advantages in terms of patient outcomes have not yet been
               demonstrated after the implementation of robotic systems in colorectal surgery.

               To evaluate the overall impact of robotic technology in colorectal surgery, further studies with high levels
               of evidence are necessary, as well as those implementing the new robotic technologies already appearing in
               operating theatres.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Conception: Genova P, Pantuso G, de’Angelis N
               Literature review: Genova P, Pantuso G, Abdalla S, Memeo R, Gaiani F, Gavriilidis P, de’Angelis N
               Writing: Genova P (Genova P and Gavriilidis P for the chapter “Ancient times: automata”)
               Revision: Genova P, Pantuso G, Abdalla S, Memeo R, Gaiani F, Gavriilidis P, de’Angelis N


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56