Page 25 - Read Online

Page 4 of 12 Moroni et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2019;3:36 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2019.34

Anisoperistaltic N N N Y

Isoperistaltic Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Anastomosis Extracorporeal Y Y N Y (253) Y

Intracorporeal Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (335) Y Y Y Y

Table 2. Table for surgical approach Mean Op. time (min) Handsewn Stapled Y Y 223 Y Y 287 Y 249 Y Y 204 Y 330 Y Y 253 Y Y 279 Y 285 MtL: medial to lateral; LtM: lateral to medial; Y: yes; N: no surgery. There is no evidence of relevant differences between the 2 approaches. MtL approach may reduce the necessary movements, therefore facilitating the The surgical principles of total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer were

Approach MtL, LtM MtL MtL MtL MtL MtL MtL MtL MtL-LtM MtL 149 195 MtL use of robotic assistance [22,28] ; early pedicle ligation may also prevent the tumor spreading throughout the mesentery [45] .

Trocar’s site Umbilicus Diagonal/Suprapubic Suprapubic Diagonal Suprapubic technical difficulties of CME in RCC with lower conversion rate than LRC [30] .

Type Robot S S SIRC Si and Xi Xi Xi Xi Xi Si Si and Xi Xi Xi S and Si Si Xi

Ballantyne et al. [19] D’Annibale et al. [20] Trastulli et al. [17] Formisano et al. [22] Lujan et al. [24] Mégevand et al. [25] Cleary et al. [27] Scotton et al. [28] Johnson et al [29] Spinoglio et al. [30] Schulte et al. [32] Complete mesocolic excision

Author Juo et al. [21] Petz et al. [23] Blumberg [26] Park et al. [31] Intra-corporeal vs. EA