Page 48 - Read Online
P. 48

Na et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2024;8:31  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2024.10  Page 11 of 12

                   1994;220:364-72; discussion 372.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               3.       Sasako M, McCulloch P, Kinoshita T, Maruyama K. New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for
                   gastric cancer. Br J Surg 1995;82:346-51.  DOI  PubMed
               4.       Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al; Registration Committee for Esophageal Cancer of the Japan Esophageal Society. Efficacy
                   of lymph node dissection by node zones according to tumor location for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Esophagus 2016;13:1-7.
                   DOI  PubMed  PMC
               5.       Kanemura T, Miyata H, Takeoka T, et al. Significance of dissection in each regional lymph-node station of esophageal cancer based on
                   efficacy index and recurrence patterns after curative esophagectomy. Esophagus 2023;20:402-9.  DOI  PubMed
               6.       Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th edition: part I. Esophagus 2017;14:1-36.  DOI
               7.       Oshikiri T, Takiguchi G, Hasegawa H, et al. Postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy is associated with pneumonia in minimally
                   invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2021;35:837-44.  DOI  PubMed
               8.       Saito Y, Takeuchi H, Fukuda K, et al. Size of recurrent laryngeal nerve as a new risk factor for postoperative vocal cord paralysis. Dis
                   Esophagus 2018;31:dox162.  DOI  PubMed
               9.       Ohi M, Toiyama Y, Yasuda H, et al. Preoperative computed tomography predicts the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis in
                   patients with esophageal cancer undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position. Esophagus 2021;18:228-38.  DOI
                   PubMed
               10.      Kanemura T, Makino T, Miyazaki Y, et al. Distribution patterns of metastases in recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes in patients
                   with squamous cell esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2017;30:1-7.  DOI  PubMed
               11.      Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, van Hilllegersberg R. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal
                   cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol 2015;112:257-65.  DOI  PubMed
               12.      Mederos MA, de Virgilio MJ, Shenoy R, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of robot-assisted, video-assisted, and open
                   esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2129228.  DOI  PubMed
                   PMC
               13.      Chao YK, Hsieh MJ, Liu YH, Liu HP. Lymph node evaluation in robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy
                   for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis. World J Surg 2018;42:590-8.  DOI  PubMed
               14.      Chen J, Liu Q, Zhang X, et al. Comparisons of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted and thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy
                   with extended two-field lymph node dissection for resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Dis
                   2019;11:3874-80.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               15.      Deng HY, Luo J, Li SX, et al. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy
                   over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched
                   analysis based on short-term outcomes. Dis Esophagus 2019;32:doy110.  DOI  PubMed
               16.      Espinoza-Mercado F, Imai TA, Borgella JD, et al. Does the approach matter? Comparing survival in robotic, minimally invasive, and
                   open esophagectomies. Ann Thorac Surg 2019;107:378-85.  DOI  PubMed
               17.      He H, Wu Q, Wang Z, et al. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a
                   propensity score matched analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;13:52.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               18.      Tagkalos E, Goense L, Hoppe-Lotichius M, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to
                   conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Dis Esophagus
                   2020;33:doz060.  DOI  PubMed
               19.      Yang Y, Zhang X, Li B, et al. Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for
                   squamous cell esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study. Dis Esophagus 2020;33:doz080.  DOI  PubMed
               20.      Zhang Y, Han Y, Gan Q, et al. Early outcomes of robot-assisted versus thoracoscopic-assisted ivor lewis esophagectomy for
                   esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study. Ann Surg Oncol 2019;26:1284-91.  DOI  PubMed
               21.      He ZF, Zheng TL, Liu DL, et al. [Comparison of short-term and long-term efficacy between robot-assisted and thoracoscopy-
                   laparoscopy-assisted radical esophageal cancer surgery]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2020;23:390-5.  DOI  PubMed
               22.      Chen H, Liu Y, Peng H, Wang R, Wang K, Li D. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally
                   invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Cancer Res 2021;10:4601-16.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               23.      Weksler B, Sharma P, Moudgill N, Chojnacki KA, Rosato EL. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to
                   thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2012;25:403-9.  DOI  PubMed
               24.      Park S, Hwang Y, Lee HJ, Park IK, Kim YT, Kang CH. Comparison of robot-assisted esophagectomy and thoracoscopic
                   esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Dis 2016;8:2853-61.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               25.      Grimminger PP, Tagkalos E, Hadzijusufovic E, Corvinus F, Babic B, Lang H. Change from hybrid to fully minimally invasive and
                   robotic esophagectomy is possible without compromises. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019;67:589-96.  DOI  PubMed
               26.      Gong L, Jiang H, Yue J, et al. Comparison of the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive, video-assisted minimally
                   invasive, and open esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 2020;12:916-24.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               27.      Xu Y, Li XK, Cong ZZ, et al. Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for
                   esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study. Dis Esophagus 2021;34:doaa114.  DOI  PubMed
               28.      Balasubramanian S, Chittawadagi B, Misra S, Ramakrishnan P, Chinnusamy P. Propensity matched analysis of short term oncological
                   and perioperative outcomes following robotic and thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for carcinoma esophagus- the first Indian
                   experience. J Robot Surg 2022;16:97-105.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53