Page 83 - Read Online
P. 83

Page 4 of 6                  Saiura. Mini-invasive Surg 2023;7:2  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2022.119

               Table 1. Public insurance reimbursement of minimally invasive HBP surgery in Japan
                Year Events
                1990  First laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Japan
                1991  First laparoscopic liver resection in Japan
                1993  First laparoscopic pancreatectomy in Japan
                2000  Laparoscopic liver resection selected as AMCS procedure
                2004  Laparoscopic pancreatectomy selected as AMCS procedure
                2010  Public insurance reimbursement of laparoscopic minor hepatectomy
                2012  Public insurance reimbursement of laparoscopic distal pancreaticoduodenectomy
                2016  Public insurance reimbursement of laparoscopic advanced hepatectomy and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
                2020  Public insurance reimbursement of robotic-assisted pancreatectomy
               AMCS: Advanced medical care system.


               Table 2. Institutional and operator criteria for minimally invasive pancreatectomy in Japan
                Operation Institutional criteria                Operator criteria
                LDP     5 or more pancreatectomies per year
                RDP     20 or more pancreatectomies per year Participation in a   5 or more robotic pancreatectomies as an operator. 20 or more
                        prospective case registry at an academic society  pancreatectomies as an operator, including 5 or more cases of
                                                                laparoscopic pancreatectomies
                LPD     50 or more pancreatectomies, including 20 or more   20 or more laparoscopic pancreatectomies as an operator
                        pancreaticoduodenectomy per year, 100 or more laparoscopic
                        surgeries per year

               LDP: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy; LPD: laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy; RDP: robotic distal pancreatectomy.

               Table 3. Operative mortality rates of all prospective case registries of laparoscopic hepatectomy and pancreatectomy in Japan 8
                Operation     Cases    Institutions     30-days mortality        90-days mortality
                LDP           1197     98               0%                       0.3%
                LPD           232      25               0.4%                     0.4%
                LH            2653     278              0.08%                    0.2%

               LDP: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy; LH: laparoscopic hepatectomy; LPD: laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.


               POST-ACCIDENT DISSEMINATION AND OUTCOMES
               The results of prospective registry showed laparoscopic hepatopancreatic resection is safe and comparable
               to open surgery [Table 3]. The 90-day mortality rates after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and
               laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy were 0.3% and 0.4%, respectively. The 90-day mortality rate after
               laparoscopic hepatectomy was 0.08%. Japanese NCD data show that the number of minimally invasive HPB
               surgery has increased dramatically over the past decade, as has been the case worldwide and in other areas
                                      [6]
               of gastrointestinal surgery . Ban et al. analyzed data focusing on laparoscopic liver resection, including
                                                                                           [7]
               148,507 cases registered in the Japanese National Clinical Database between 2011 and 2017 . In their report,
               the percentage of laparoscopic liver resections without additional vascular complications or biliary
               reconstruction increased from 9.9% in 2011 to 24.8% in 2017. Operative mortality was 3.6% for both
               advanced laparoscopic liver resection and open liver resection in 2011, and decreased to 1.0% and 2.0%,
               respectively, in 2017. An international benchmark study of laparoscopic liver resection was recently
               published, which, similar to reports from other countries, demonstrated the superiority of laparoscopic
               surgery over open liver resection in terms of short-term outcomes such as blood loss and postoperative
               hospital stay . Although minor hepatectomy was considered standard (IDEAL 3), major hepatectomy is
                          [8]
               still under consideration (IDEAL 2b), and is recommended to use with caution.
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88