Page 31 - Read Online

Page 6 of 7 Ruff et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2024;8:12 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2024.39

hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
2015;22:721-7. DOI PubMed
8. Kabir T, Tan ZZ, Syn NL, et al. Laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: meta-
analysis. Br J Surg 2021;109:21-9. DOI PubMed
9. Fay K, Patel AD. Should robot-assisted surgery tolerate or even accommodate less surgical dexterity? AMA J Ethics 2023;25:E609-
614. DOI PubMed
10. Liang B, Peng Y, Yang W, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior segments: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. HPB 2024;In press. DOI PubMed
11. Sijberden JP, Hoogteijling TJ, Aghayan D, et al; International consortium on Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (I-MILS). Robotic
versus laparoscopic liver resection in various settings: an international multicenter propensity score matched study of 10.075 patients.
Ann Surg 2024;280:108-17. DOI PubMed PMC
12. Winckelmans T, Wicherts DA, Parmentier I, De Meyere C, Verslype C, D’Hondt M. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a
single surgeon experience of 629 consecutive minimally invasive liver resections. World J Surg 2023;47:2241-9. DOI PubMed
13. Fruscione M, Pickens R, Baker EH, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic major liver resection: analysis of outcomes from a
single center. HPB 2019;21:906-11. DOI PubMed
14. Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 2014;259:549-55.
DOI PubMed
15. Chiow AKH, Fuks D, Choi GH, et al; International Robotic and Laparoscopic Liver Resection Study Group collaborators.
International multicentre propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy. Br J
Surg 2021;108:1513-20. DOI PubMed PMC
16. Fagenson AM, Gleeson EM, Pitt HA, Lau KN. Minimally invasive hepatectomy in North America: laparoscopic versus robotic. J
Gastrointest Surg 2021;25:85-93. DOI PubMed
17. Chong Y, Prieto M, Gastaca M, et al; International robotic and laparoscopic liver resection study group investigators. An international
multicentre propensity score matched analysis comparing between robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy. Surg Endosc
2023;37:3439-48. DOI PubMed PMC
18. Vining CC, Al Abbas AI, Kuchta K, et al. Risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive hepatectomy with
unplanned conversion: a contemporary NSQIP analysis. HPB 2023;25:577-88. DOI PubMed
19. Kamel MK, Tuma F, Keane CA, Blebea J. National trends and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted hepatectomy in the USA: a
propensity-score matched analysis from the national cancer database. World J Surg 2022;46:189-96. DOI PubMed
20. Zhu P, Liao W, Ding ZY, et al. Learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2019;23:1778-87.
DOI PubMed
21. Fukumori D, Tschuor C, Penninga L, Hillingsø J, Svendsen LB, Larsen PN. Learning curves in robot-assisted minimally invasive liver
surgery at a high-volume center in Denmark: report of the first 100 patients and review of literature. Scand J Surg 2023;112:164-72.
DOI PubMed
22. Krenzien F, Benzing C, Feldbrügge L, et al. Complexity-adjusted learning curves for robotic and laparoscopic liver resection: a word
of caution. Ann Surg Open 2022;3:e131. DOI PubMed PMC
23. Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, et al. Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the
learning curve. JAMA Surg 2015;150:416-22. DOI PubMed
24. Mark Knab L, Zenati MS, Khodakov A, et al. Evolution of a novel robotic training curriculum in a complex general surgical oncology
fellowship. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25:3445-52. DOI PubMed
25. Abbas AI, Jung JP, Rice MK, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ 3rd, Hogg ME. Methodology for developing an educational and research video
library in minimally invasive surgery. J Surg Educ 2019;76:745-55. DOI PubMed
26. Rice MK, Zenati MS, Novak SM, et al. Crowdsourced assessment of inanimate biotissue drills: a valid and cost-effective way to
evaluate surgical trainees. J Surg Educ 2019;76:814-23. DOI PubMed
27. Tam V, Zenati M, Novak S, et al. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy biotissue curriculum has validity and improves technical
performance for surgical oncology fellows. J Surg Educ 2017;74:1057-65. DOI PubMed
28. Hogg ME, Tam V, Zenati M, et al. Mastery-based virtual reality robotic simulation curriculum: the first step toward operative robotic
proficiency. J Surg Educ 2017;74:477-85. DOI PubMed
29. Rice MK, Hodges JC, Bellon J, et al. Association of mentorship and a formal robotic proficiency skills curriculum with subsequent
generations’ learning curve and safety for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. JAMA Surg 2020;155:607-15. DOI PubMed PMC
30. Nota CL, Rinkes IHB, Hagendoorn J. Setting up a robotic hepatectomy program: a Western-European experience and perspective.
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2017;6:239-45. DOI PubMed PMC
31. Lai ECH, Tang CN. Training robotic hepatectomy: the Hong Kong experience and perspective. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2017;6:222-9.
DOI PubMed PMC
32. King JC, Zeh HJ 3rd, Zureikat AH, et al. Safety in numbers: progressive implementation of a robotics program in an academic surgical
oncology practice. Surg Innov 2016;23:407-14. DOI PubMed
33. Wu CY, Chen PD, Chou WH, Liang JT, Huang CS, Wu YM. Is robotic hepatectomy cost-effective? In view of patient-reported
outcomes. Asian J Surg 2019;42:543-50. DOI PubMed
34. Cortolillo N, Patel C, Parreco J, Kaza S, Castillo A. Nationwide outcomes and costs of laparoscopic and robotic vs. open hepatectomy.