Page 59 - Read Online
P. 59

Page 104                   Perkins. J Transl Genet Genom 2022;6:95-110  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2021.47

                              [144]
               in mice [141-143] , rats , and frogs [145-148] . These models exhibit progressive rod degeneration and have proven
               invaluable toward understanding the mechanisms of degeneration caused by different pathogenic mutations
               in the rhodopsin gene. To determine if a zebrafish model of RP could be utilized to study the molecular
               signals stimulating regeneration, a construct was made that contained a 1.8 kb fragment of the zebrafish
               rhodopsin promoter to drive expression of a mouse rhodopsin carrying the P23H mutation fused to a C-
                             [149]
               terminal Flag tag . The P23H mutation was chosen as it is the most frequent rhodopsin mutation to cause
               adRP  and  was  the  first  mutation  identified  in  humans . The  resulting  stable  transgenic  line,
                                                                    [150]
               Tg(rho:Mmu.Rho_P23H-FLAG)uth4Tg expressed the P23H-rhodopsin-FLAG beginning at 3 dpf. The
               mutant rhodopsin protein was mislocalized throughout the cell body and synapses in larval animals. Rod
               outer segments were shorter in larval stages but cones appeared normal. In adult transgenic animals, very
               few rods were observed and the P23H-rhodopsin-FLAG protein was significantly mislocalized in the
               remaining rods. Endogenous wild-type rhodopsin was also mislocalized, indicating that expression of the
               P23H-rhodopsin had deleterious effects on trafficking of outer segment proteins. Adult transgenic animals
               had a 3-fold reduction in the number of nuclei in the ONL, indicating degeneration of rods. Interestingly,
               cone inner segments and outer segments were shorter in transgenic animals compared to adults, although
               the total number of Zpr1+ cones was unchanged. These results suggested that transgenic expression of a
               P23H-rhodopsin mutant causes secondary damage to cones. This differs from the rhodopsin (rh1-1)
               knockout zebrafish mutants, which had normal cone morphology . At both 4 mpf and 6 mpf, it was
                                                                          [42]
               noticed that the number of proliferating cells (PCNA+) was considerably higher in the ONL of transgenic
               animals compared to wild-type. There was no signs of proliferation within the INL. Cell proliferation was
               confirmed by BrdU labeling and many of the BrdU+ cells also expressed rhodopsin, indicating that the
               newly post-mitotic cells were rods. Together, these results demonstrate that rod degeneration caused by
               expression of a P23H-rhodopsin transgene can initiate a regeneration response from rod precursors but not
               from Müller glia.

               PERSPECTIVES
               The mutants and transgenic models described herein represent a variety of human retinal dystrophy
               conditions, ranging from ciliopathies to RP to cone-rod dystrophy. As zebrafish also possesses the capacity
               to regenerate, it remains unclear why the response to progressive degeneration differs so greatly from acute
               damage. Inflammation is believed to be critical for the initial reprogramming of Müller glia , but excess
                                                                                              [151]
               inflammation compromises survival of regenerated photoreceptors . Whether chronic inflammation may
                                                                        [152]
               limit Müller glia reprogramming remains unanswered. It is also known that Notch signaling suppresses
               regeneration [153,154] . Following acute injury, expression of notch3 is significantly downregulated prior to
               Müller glia proliferation. Understanding potential differences in the transcriptional responses of Müller
               glia  and microglia  to disease and injury will hopefully help answer why zebrafish do not regenerate in
                  [155]
                                 [156]
               these IRD models.
               CONCLUSION
               The zebrafish represents an ideal genetic model to study the pathology of retinal degeneration in a cone-rich
               retina. The development of new genetic tools for genome editing allow investigators to target candidate
               genes of interest. Indeed, many of the models described herein were generated by genome editing
               technologies. The power of unbiased forward genetic screens thrust zebrafish into the scientific mainstream
               by uncovering genes essential for vertebrate development and function. In the future, more sophisticated or
               sensitive forward genetic screening approaches could be utilized to identify adult-onset phenotypes in a
               space- and cost-efficient manner that will reveal even more genes and pathways critical for the health and
               survival of photoreceptors.
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64