Page 22 - Read Online
P. 22

Page 272                             Arroyo Seguí et al. J Transl Genet Genom 2020;4:263-77  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2020.35




                    Level of evidence 1  Not available  Not available  OPRD1 rs678849: Level 2B    rs529520: Level 3  rs581111: Level 3  Other variants:  Not available  CYP3A4 rs2740574: Level 3  Other gene-variants:  Not available











                    Ref.  [29]                [30]     [31]             [45]









                      No significant association found  No significant association found  European Americans  were found with other OPRD1 variants  or UGT2B7 variants  For CYP3A4 rs2740574, a significant  genotype achieved increased pain relief
                    Findings                           No significant associations observed amongst   In the African American subset, a significant  association was observed for rs678849, where  carriers of the T-allele (CT/TT) were less likely  to have opioid-positive drug screens, compared  to the CC genotype. No significant associations  No significant association was found for OPRM1   association was found, where carriers of the AA












                    Variant/allele  rs1799971  5-HTTLPR  rs6311  rs1800544  rs4680  Many 2  Haplotype:  rs671531   rs558948   rs645027   rs10485058  rs678849  rs529520  rs581111  rs1042114  rs10753331  rs2234918  rs1799971  rs7439366  rs2740574









                    Genes               CYP1A2 CYP2B6   CYP2C19 CYP2C9   CYP2D6 CYP3A4
                 Table 1. Buprenorphine pharmacogenomic studies and findings
                      OPRM1  SLC6A4  HTR2A  ADRA2A  COMT  OPRM1  OPRD1  OPRM1  UGT2B7  CYP3A4






                    Outcomes  Mean dose, dropout   rate  Urine drug screens for   opioids  Urine drug screens for   opioids  Analgesic response   to transdermal   buprenorphine










                    Ethnicity & Sex   Mixed, American   (n = 410, 71% males) (74% European American)  (Subset of START trial)  European American  (n = 299, 73% males)  (subset of START trial)  European American   (n = 291, 73% males)  vs.   African American  (n = 41, 66% males)  (Subset of START trial)  Spanish  (n = 93, 77% males)
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27