Page 91 - Read Online
P. 91

Sulaiman et al. J Transl Genet Genom 2020;4:159-87  I  https://doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2020.27                                         Page 177

               CHALLENGES IN DIAGNOSING MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASES
               Even though quite significant publications of disease-causing mutations are available, challenges remain on
               how to improve the diagnosis of these mitochondrial diseases in clinical settings, as the rate of detection
               for disease-causing mutations is only 25%-50% of cases [180,184,192] . Most of the diagnosis approaches are using
               the NGS technologies, in which the first step is to use the WES approach, followed by a muscle biopsy if
               more confirmation is needed for the pathogenicity [180] . Various reasons can explain the failure to detect
               mtDNA mutations in some patients, such as the existence of the difficult-to-detect mutations, including the
               recurrent de novo mutations [233] , splice site defects, mutations in deep intronic or repeated sequences, and
               others [180,184,192] . One way to address such limitation is to use trio sequencing of parents and child to allow
               for accurate detections of these difficult-to-detect mutations, as used by the Deciphering Developmental
               Disorders Project [234] , and the Genomics England 100,000 Genomes (100K) Project [235] .

               With the problems of heteroplasmic mtDNA mutations, many recommend that sequencing of muscle DNA
               is needed to complement the WES findings, especially with the low mutant load. Since most patients with
               mitochondrial diseases are usually carrying a mixture of wild-type and mutated mtDNA (heteroplasmic),
               their clinical manifestations of the disease also depend on the ratio of the mutated to wild-type mtDNA [236] .
               Some of these low-frequency heteroplasmy variants can turn into deleterious high heteroplasmy variants [237] ,
               and could thereby further complicate the diagnosis. Integrated analysis of the omics can also help to improve
               the diagnosis, as multiple omic findings could verify the accuracy of the results. An example is a cohort study
               of adult mitochondrial disease patients with the mtDNA mutation m.3243 A à G, in which the combined
               analysis of proteomics and metabolomics of their urine samples showed very distinct alterations in lysosomal
               proteins, calcium-binding proteins, and antioxidant defenses [238] . Importantly, these changes were evident
               in the asymptomatic carriers of m.3243A>G [238] , therefore suggesting the plausibility of a new and early
               screening strategy of this type of mutation in the patients and their families.

               Another issue is the presence of the NUMTs that could interfere with WES or WGS data interpretation
               and analysis [194] . The indirect method using the WES/WGS data to identify the mitochondrial mutations
               is a favorable approach due to its cost-effectiveness and high reproducibility. However, the presence of the
               NUMTs gives some ambiguity to the results [184,191] . Thus, some studies have opted for an addition of the
               mitochondrial isolation step in the workflow before RNA extraction and sequencing steps to eliminate
               the NUMTs. However, the resources used are enormous and labor-intensive [191] . Similarly, the proteomic
               approach for the mitochondrial study also faces the challenges of getting pure mitochondrial proteins [208] .
               To enrich these mitochondria, many methods have been developed, including the mechanical or chemical
               disruption method, the differential centrifugation method, and recently introduced magnetic device
               method [239-241] . However, mitochondrial proteins have dynamic ranges; thus, the samples usually undergo
               fractionation to reduce their complexity before the analysis [208] , which could increase the cost and time
               spent for each additional procedure. Most studies use sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel
               electrophoresis (PAGE), and gel slicing to separate the proteins, followed by high-performance LC-MS
               analysis [208,239,242-244] . Despite the vast potential of these proteomic applications to diagnose mitochondrial
               disease, the problems lie within the diversity and tissue-specific expression of these mitochondrial proteins.
               Currently, only indirect measurements are available to detect them [208] . Moreover, the lack of methods to
               differentiate between the mitochondrial and cytoplasmic functions of these proteins [208]  also contribute to
               the problems. In addition, there are also the issues of technical expertise to use the proteome interactome
               analysis tools, and the expensive cost to run the comprehensive proteome profiling [208] . Therefore, innovative
               approaches and advancement of the proteomic applications in the future are needed to solve these issues,
               and hopefully to increase the potential of these proteomic applications in diagnosing mitochondrial diseases.

               Another improvement for the diagnosis of mitochondrial disease using the genetic data is to perform
               periodic reanalysis of WES/WGS data of the patients, using various or newly improved bioinformatic
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96