Page 10 - Read Online
P. 10

Page 20                                                       Pascolini. J Transl Genet Genom 2020;4:17-21.  I  https://doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2020.05

               triangular face, long philtrum, large and protruding ears, ocular anomalies (hypertelorism, telecanthus, long
               palpebral fissures), broad and thick eyebrows, an abnormal nose with anteverted nares and underdeveloped
               alae nasi, and malformed teeth (macro-oligodontia, wide upper central or fused incisors, ridged teeth). On
               the other hand, a long face with a broad forehead, broad chin, large and protruding ears with overfolded
               helices, upslanted palpebral fissures, high and narrow palate with cleft lip/palate, everted lower lip vermilion,
               small widely spaced teeth and typical nose morphology (tubular-pear shaped nose with broad nasal tip) define
                                                                                                       [12]
               KdVS. Interestingly, macrodontia is a frequently observed clinical sign in KBGS (> 80% of patients) ,
                                                                                             [13]
               as well as an abnormal nose can also be considered a distinctive KdVS facial dysmorphism . Dental and
               nasal malformations, such as a bulbous nose with broad nasal bridge, are also frequently identified in the
               SETD5-syndrome, demonstrating a strong overlapping facial gestalt between these three conditions. These
               observations could be explained by the common biological cause of the diseases, or mutations in genes
               encoding key molecules for histones changes.

               Results of the DeepGestalt experiment are in line with the above hypothesis. Specifically, the SETD5-KBGS
               comparison analysis demonstrated AUC and ROC values compatible with a high degree of facial overlap, which
               was shown by the two overlapping curves in the binary comparison and by the ROC graphic [Figure 1B]. A
               minor facial similarity was registered in the SETD5-KdVS comparison. All three conditions were distinctly
               recognized by the DeepGestalt technology and the obtained results seem to indicate that this group of
               disorders are all characterized by distinctive dysmorphisms, confirming what has recently been illustrated in
                                                                                         [14]
               a clinical phenotyping study on ID syndromes related to mutations in histones modifiers .

               Furthermore, the DeepGestalt technology has been demonstrated to not be influenced by ethnicity,
               according to previously published works, which analyzed the facial features of individuals with different
               ancestries and affected by diverse genetic conditions [15-17] . These studies showed that the technology identifies
               facial gestalt independently from an individual’s ancestry.

               Craniofacial malformations are possibly related to mutations in SETD5, which could be involved in facial
               morphogenesis, analogously to other chromatin remodeling genes. For example, ANKRD11 has been
                                                                                [10]
                                                       [18]
               demonstrated to influence bone development  and facial morphogenesis . Interestingly, the nose and
               mouth regions are often malformed in the SETD5-related phenotype. The possible connection between this
               gene and the embryological pathways regulating nose and mouth formation could be an interesting area of
               research. In this scenario, deregulation of embryonic structures controlling physiological facial development
               such as the neural crests, could be further investigated in affected individuals. However, all these have to be
               verified in future studies.


               In conclusion, a novel study regarding the ID syndrome related to SETD5 mutations by using the
               DeepGestalt technology has been here illustrated. The present results highlight the strong facial resemblance
               between affected subjects and those with KBGS, suggesting to perform SETD5 analysis in negatives cases
               for ANKRD11 mutations. Furthermore, nose and mouth abnormalities should be evaluated with careful
               attention in ID individuals because distinctive dysmorphic facies is an important clinical handle. Finally,
               a possible role of SETD5 in facial deformities could be hypothesized, based on the demonstrated action of
               other histones modifiers on craniofacial development.


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               The author would like to thank Nicole Fleischer who is an employee of FDNA Inc. (Boston, MA, USA), the
               company providing Face2Gene, for her kind cooperation in this study.

               Authors’ contributions
               The author contributed solely to the article.
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15