Page 95 - Read Online
P. 95

Papadodima et al. J Transl Genet Genom 2019;3:7. I  https://doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2018.33                                      Page 5 of 12

               Table 1. Somatic variance calling tools
                Analysis tactic                                       Variant callers
                                               [31]
               Heuristic approaches         qSNP , RADIA [32] , Shimmer [33] , SOAPsnv [34] , VarDict [35] , VarScan2 [36]
                Joint genotype analysis      CaVEMan [37] , FaSD-somatic [38] , JointSNVMix2 [39] , SAMtools [40] , Seurat* [41] , SNVSniffer [42] ,
                                             SomaticSniper [43] , Virmid [44]
                Allele frequency             deepSNV [45] , EBCall [46] , LoFreq [47] , LoLoPicker [48] , MuTect [49] , Strelka [50]
                                                   [51]
                Haplotype analysis           FreeBayes , HapMuC [52] , LocHap [53] , MuTect2 [49] , Platypus [54]
                Machine learning             BAYSIC [55] , MutationSeq [56] , SNooPer [57] , SomaticSeq [58]
                Single-sample analysis       GATKcan [59] , ISOWN [60] , OutLyzer [61] , Pisces [62] , SiNVICT [63] , SomVarIUS [64]
                                                                                                   [71]
                Structural or copy number variation calling  APOLOH [65] , BIC-Seq [66] , BreakDancer [67] , Break-Pointer [68] , CNVkit [69] , CoNIFER [70] , Delly ,
                                             HYDRA [72] , GASV [73] , GASVPro [74] , Meerkat [65] , PeSV-Fisher [75] , VariationHunter-CommonLaw [76]
                RNA-seq variant calling      eSNVdetect [77] , SNPiR [78] , VarDict [35] , VarScan2 [36]

               Table 2. Driver mutation calling tools
                Analysis tactic                                     Driver callers
                Functional impact      CanPredict [81] , Condel [82] , FATHMM [83] , GERP++ [84] , GOSS [85] , MutationAssessor [86,87] , MutationTaster [88] ,
                                       Oncodrive-fm [89] , PMUT [90] , PolyPhen-2 [91] , PROVEAN [92] , SIFT [93] , SNPs3D [94] , TransFIC [95]
                Mutation frequency     DrGaP [96] , MuSiC [97] , MutSig/MutSigCV [25] , Youn and Simon [98]
                Machine learning       CHASM [99,100] , DMI [101]
                Structural or copy number focus  ADMIRE [102] , CMDS [103] , GISTIC2 [104] , JISTIC [105]
                Positional/structural clustering  iPAC [106] , NMC [107]
                Pathway/network analysis  BioInfoMiner [108] , Dendrix [109] , GSEA [110] , HotNet [109] , MEMo [111] , Multi-Dendrix [112] , NetBox [113] , PathScan [114] ,
                                       Patient-oriented gene sets [115] , RME [116]

               most frequently mutated genes of this pathway. Other pathways found significantly altered in CM include
               the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, tumour protein 53 (TP53) signaling, cell cycle regulation and
               the telomere length maintenance pathway. In the next section, the most significant genes involved in such
               key processes, harboring driver mutations, are summarized.

               BRAF
               The BRAF gene encodes a serine/threonine protein kinase, belonging to the RAF family. This protein acts
               as a downstream effector of RAS-signalling in the MAPK cascade, affecting cell proliferation and survival.
               Mutations in this gene have been identified in various cancers. According to the COSMIC database 44% of
               melanomas arising from skin tissue have mutations in BRAF. In non-acral CM, the BRAF mutation of the
               kinase-activation domain at amino acid position 600, is the most common somatic mutation. Interestingly,
               BRAF V600E mutation results from a T →A transversion and not a C>T substitution, which is characteristic
               of UV light induced mutagenesis. Nevertheless, epidemiological and genomic evidence implies that UV
               radiation contributes to the formation of BRAF V600E. Soon after the characterization of BRAF V600E
               mutation in melanomas, it became apparent that its distribution greatly differs among different melanoma
               subtypes [117] . In particular, BRAF V600E mutations are more common in younger CM patients, whose
               melanomas arise on intermittently sun-exposed skin, on anatomical sites such as the trunk and proximal
               extremities. In contrast, melanomas arising on chronically sun-damaged skin, usually on anatomical sites
               like head, neck and the distal extremities of older individuals, have infrequent BRAF mutations, with
               BRAF V600K being more frequent than BRAF V600E [118] . Acral melanomas bear BRAF mutations much
               less frequently. Targeting the BRAF-V600E mutant protein with specific inhibitors exposed new therapeutic
               aspects for the management of such an aggressive disease. The oncogenic activation of BRAF mutations is
               considered a necessary but not sufficient condition to transform melanocytes to melanoma cells, a suggestion
               which is also supported by the frequent occurrence of such mutations in benign nevi [119] .


               RAS
               RAS proteins are small GTPases functioning as GDP-GTP-regulated binary switches that control many
               fundamental cellular processes. RAS proteins connect a great variety of upstream signals from activated
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100