Page 36 - Read Online
P. 36
Clédel et al. J Surveill Secur Saf 2020;1:11939 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jsss.2020.08 Page 137 of 139
To provide an overall view of the main notions included in this paper, we refer the reader to the three glossaries,
respectively, related to: resilience definitions [Table 3], resilience properties [Table 4], and resilience metrics
[Table 5]. Based on the observations made, and on the classifications of the existing definitions, properties,
and metrics, there are several topics that can be addressed in future works.
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Wrote and review the article: Clédel T, Cuppens N, Cuppens F,Dagnas R.
Each author contributed equally to the paper.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Financial support and sponsorship
This work was supported by the Cyber CNI Chair of Institute Mines-Télécom which is held by IMT Atlantique
and supported by Airbus Defence and Space, Amossys, BNP Parisbas, EDF, Nokia and the Regional Council
of Brittany; it has been acknowledged by the French Centre of Excellence in Cybersecurity.
Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
REFERENCES
1. Peng Y, Lu T, Liu J, Gao Y, Guo X, Xie F. Cyberphysical System Risk Assessment, 2013 Ninth International Conference on Intelligent
Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing, 2013,Oct. 1618, Beijing, China. IEEE, 2013. pp. 4427.
2. Mauthe A, Hutchison D, Çetinkaya EK, et al. Disasterresilient communication networks: Principles and best practices, 2016 8th Inter
national Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM), 2013 Oct. 1618, Halmstad, Sweden. IEEE, 2016. pp. 110.
3. Hollnagel E. Resilience: The challenge of the unstable. In: Hollnagel E, Woods D, Leveson N, editors. Resilience engineering: Concepts
and precepts, 1st ed. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006. pp. 917.
4. Carvalho P V R, dos Santos I L, Gomes J O, Borges M R S. Micro incident analysis framework to assess safety and resilience in the
operation of safe critical systems: A case study in a nuclear power plant. J Loss Prevent Proc 2008;21:277–86.
5. Saurin T A, Carim Júnior G C. Evaluation and improvement of a method for assessing HSMS from the resilience engineering perspective:
A case study of an electricity distributor. Saf Sci 2011;49:355–68.
6. Azadeh A, Salehi V, Ashjari B, Saberi M. Performance evaluation of integrated resilience engineering factors by data envelopment analysis:
The case of a petrochemical plant. Proc Saf Environ Protec 2014;92:231–41.
7. Shirali G H A, Motamedzade M, Mohammadfam I, Ebrahimipour V, Moghimbeigi A. Challenges in building resilience engineering (RE)
and adaptive capacity: A field study in a chemical plant. Process Saf Environ 2012;90:83–90.
8. Morel G, Amalberti R, Chauvin C. How good micro/macro ergonomics may improve resilience, but not necessarily safety. Saf Sci
2009;47:285–94.
9. Abech M P, Berg G A, Delis M G, Guimaraes L B M, Woods D D, editors. Analyzing Resilience of an Oil Distribution Plant. Proceedings
of the 2006 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium; 2006 April 2828; Charlottesville, VA, USA. IEEE; 2007.
10. Hale A, Heijer T. Is resilience really necessary? The case of railways. In: Hollnagel E, Woods D, Leveson N, editors. Resilience
engineering: Concepts and precepts, 1st ed. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006. pp. 12548
11. Holling C S. Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1973;4:1–23.