Page 105 - Read Online

Shu et al. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 36 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2025.13 Page 29 of 31

96. Goodfellow, I. J.; Pouget-Abadie, J.; Mirza, M.; et al. Generative adversarial networks. arXiv 2014, arXiv:1406.2661. https://doi.org/
10.48550/arXiv.1406.2661. (accessed 27 May 2025)
97. Zheng, Z.; Zhang, O.; Borgs, C.; Chayes, J. T.; Yaghi, O. M. ChatGPT chemistry assistant for text mining and the prediction of MOF
synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 18048-62. DOI PubMed PMC
98. OpenAI: Optimizing language models for dialogue. 2023. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/. (accessed 27 May 2025).
99. Chowdhary, K. R. Natural language processing. In: Fundamentals of artificial intelligence. New Delhi: Springer India; 2020. pp. 603-
49. DOI
100. Zhu, J. J.; Yang, M.; Ren, Z. J. Machine learning in environmental research: common pitfalls and best practices. Environ. Sci.
Technol. 2023, 57, 17671-89. DOI PubMed
101. Li, Z.; Yoon, J.; Zhang, R.; et al. Machine learning in concrete science: applications, challenges, and best practices. npj. Comput.
Mater. 2022, 8, 810. DOI
102. Artrith, N.; Butler, K. T.; Coudert, F. X.; et al. Best practices in machine learning for chemistry. Nat. Chem. 2021, 13, 505-8. DOI
103. Wong, T. Performance evaluation of classification algorithms by k-fold and leave-one-out cross validation. Pattern. Recognit. 2015,
48, 2839-46. DOI
104. Efron, B.; Tibshirani, R. J. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall/CRC: 1994. https://www.hms.harvard.edu/bss/neuro/
bornlab/nb204/statistics/bootstrap.pdf. (accessed 27 May 2025).
105. Palanivinayagam, A.; El-Bayeh, C. Z.; Damaševičius, R. Twenty years of machine-learning-based text classification: a systematic
review. Algorithms 2023, 16, 236. DOI
106. Sebastiani, F. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM. Comput. Surv. 2002, 34, 1-47. DOI
107. Chicco, D.; Jurman, G. The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary
classification evaluation. BMC. Genomics. 2020, 21, 6. DOI PubMed PMC
108. Ho, S. Y.; Phua, K.; Wong, L.; Bin, G. W. W. Extensions of the external validation for checking learned model interpretability and
generalizability. Patterns 2020, 1, 100129. DOI PubMed PMC
109. Xiong, Z.; Cui, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, M.; Hu, J. Evaluating explorative prediction power of machine learning algorithms for
materials discovery using k-fold forward cross-validation. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2020, 171, 109203. DOI
110. Probst, P.; Bischl, B.; Boulesteix, A. L. Tunability: importance of hyperparameters of machine learning algorithms. arXiv 2018,
arXiv:1802.09596. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.09596. (accessed 27 May 2025)
111. Bischl, B.; Binder, M.; Lang, M.; et al. Hyperparameter optimization: foundations, algorithms, best practices, and open challenges.
WIREs. Data. Min. Knowl. 2023, 13, e1484. DOI
112. Li, L.; Jamieson, K.; DeSalvo, G.; Rostamizadeh, A.; Talwalkar, A. Hyperband: a novel bandit-based approach to hyperparameter
optimization. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1603.06560. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1603.06560. (accessed 27 May 2025)
113. Victoria, A. H.; Maragatham, G. Automatic tuning of hyperparameters using Bayesian optimization. Evol. Syst. 2021, 12, 217-23.
DOI
114. Sa, B.; Hu, R.; Zheng, Z.; et al. High-throughput computational screening and machine learning modeling of Janus 2D III-VI van der
Waals heterostructures for solar energy applications. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 6687-701. DOI
115. Mooraj, S.; Chen, W. A review on high-throughput development of high-entropy alloys by combinatorial methods. J. Mater. Inf.
2023, 3, 4. DOI
116. Sa, Z.; Liu, F.; Zhuang, X.; et al. Toward high bias-stress stability P-type GaSb nanowire field-effect-transistor for gate-controlled
near-infrared photodetection and photocommunication. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2304064. DOI
117. Kang, Y.; Hou, X.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Ultrahigh-performance and broadband photodetector from visible to shortwave infrared band
based on GaAsSb nanowires. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 501, 157392. DOI
118. Kang, Y.; Hou, X.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Enhanced visible-NIR dual-band performance of GaAs nanowire photodetectors through phase
manipulation. Adv. Opt. Mater.2025, 2500289. DOI
119. Li, D.; Lan, C.; Manikandan, A.; et al. Ultra-fast photodetectors based on high-mobility indium gallium antimonide nanowires. Nat.
Commun. 2019, 10, 1664. DOI PubMed PMC
120. Gao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Hu, W.; Yang, J. First-principles computational screening of two-dimensional polar materials for photocatalytic
water splitting. ACS. Nano. 2024, 18, 19381-90. DOI
121. Kangsabanik, J.; Svendsen, M. K.; Taghizadeh, A.; Crovetto, A.; Thygesen, K. S. Indirect band gap semiconductors for thin-film
photovoltaics: high-throughput calculation of phonon-assisted absorption. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 19872-83. DOI PubMed
122. Jiang, X.; Yin, W. High-throughput computational screening of oxide double perovskites for optoelectronic and photocatalysis
applications. J. Energy. Chem. 2021, 57, 351-8. DOI
123. Tang, J.; Xue, J.; Xu, H.; et al. Power generation density boost of bifacial tandem solar cells revealed by high throughput
optoelectrical modelling. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2024, 17, 6068-78. DOI
124. Xie, T.; Grossman, J. C. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material
properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 145301. DOI PubMed
125. Liang, C.; Rouzhahong, Y.; Ye, C.; Li, C.; Wang, B.; Li, H. Material symmetry recognition and property prediction accomplished by
crystal capsule representation. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5198. DOI PubMed PMC
126. Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A.; Toriyama, M. Y.; Sen, F. G.; Davis, M. J.; Klie, R. F.; Chan, M. K. Y. Machine-learned impurity level
prediction for semiconductors: the example of Cd-based chalcogenides. npj. Comput. Mater. 2020, 6, 296. DOI