Page 319 - Read Online
P. 319

Page 6 of 9             Mokhamatam et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2020;6:28  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2020.38

               it helps in improving personalised medicine [73,76] . However, there are two main disadvantages of organoid
               models: (1) cost; and (2) better and easier assays need to be developed further for efficient screening. As
               these organoids harbourthe heterogeneity of the tumour, classical assays based on a single type of cells are
               not enough. This research area is mainly dependent on omics studies, such as genomics, transcriptomics,
               and proteomics [73,77] . Extensive research in this novel field might contribute to overcoming these limitations.


               CONCLUSION
               Decades of research and accumulating literature has revealed the complexity of EMT driven by its intricate
               network of physiology that is difficult to imitate under lab conditions as experimental model systems.
               Though many models are being used, they have their limitations and are currently unable to mimic the
               in vivo nature of EMT sufficiently. Researchers still struggle with falsepositive and false negative results
               due to these problems. Therefore, the problem should be addressed with a holistic approach including
               a combination of feasible 2D, 3D and organoid models along with omics studies to achieve meaningful
               outcomes for patient care. Given the modern progression of science and technology, with the merger of
               advanced interdisciplinary tools, we may soon see game-changing giant leaps of success in the precision
               targeting of EMT.


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               We want to acknowledge Transcell Oncologics (www.transcellonco.science) investors for privately funding
               research and drug discovery in the company. We would also like to thank the Technology Business
               Incubator, University of Hyderabad, for providing lab space and facilities.

               Authors’ contributions
               Wrote the manuscript with input received from Irlapati V and Dravida S: Mokhamatam RB
               Contributed in supporting with references, summarizing the interpretation with critical feedback: Irlapati
               VK
               Conceived the framework of the review, supported by providing overall direction with the flow, edited the
               manuscript: Dravida S

               Availability and data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflict of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.
   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324