Page 364 - Read Online
P. 364

Page 4 of 14                            Pereira et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2018;4:30  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2018.13

               margin status. The one associated with the best outcomes is a R0 resection which means a total gross excision
               and negative histological margins; R1 resection is a total gross excision however with positive histological
               margins; and, R2 is a resection with residual gross tumor and patients that undergo R2 resection have similar
               prognosis of the unresectable patients treated with non-operative therapy, on account of that, surgeries that
               will result in R2 margins should not be consider as resectable [23,29] .


               To improve survival for locally advanced patients neoadjuvant therapy has been evaluated aiming to shrink
               tumor, enhance resectability and also to increase rates of microscopic complete tumor resection .
                                                                                                [30]


               CHEMOTHERAPY GEMZAR - GEMCITABINE
               Gemcitabine is a deoxycytidine (dCTP) analogue, which is converted by nucleoside kinases into two metabolites
               diphosphate (dFdCDP) and triphosphate (dFdCTP). Each of these metabolites have a specific mechanism of action:
               (1) the diphosphate metabolite (dFdCDP) inhibits ribonuclease reductase, an enzyme known for catalyzing the
               reaction that generates ribonucleotides necessary for DNA synthesis; (2) the triphosphate metabolite (dFdCTP)
               competes with the natural dCTP for its incorporation into DNA newly synthetized strands. Once dFdCTP
               is incorporated, only one additional nucleotide is added to the growing DNA strands, which stops the DNA
               synthesis and eventually results in activation of apoptosis pathway leading the cells to death .
                                                                                          [31]
               Gemcitabine, as single-agent, became the first line treatment (1996) for advanced pancreatic cancer since a
               randomized trial showing that 23.8% of patients had experienced a clinical benefit response compared with
               4.8% of patients treated with fluorouracil (5-FU). Gemcitabine also confers a modest improvement in overall
               survival than those observed in patients group treated with 5-FU. The patients’ overall survival rates at 12
               months were 18% for gemcitabine and 2% for patients treated with 5-FU .
                                                                            [32]
               In the following decade, gemcitabine has become the backbone of combination regimen for new experimental
               approaches with either other cytotoxic molecules or novel chemotherapy agents . Many phase II trials have
                                                                                  [33]
               demonstrated the efficacy of gemcitabine-based combinations, which comprise other cytotoxic molecules
               such as capecitabine, 5-FU, cisplatin, irinotecan [34-37]  or the targeted agents sorafenib and cetuximab [38-40] .
               However, in some randomized phase III trials of gemcitabine based chemotherapy combinations, these
               combinations failed to show statistically significant improvement in patient’s overall survival when compared
               to gemcitabine used as a single-agent [41-46] .


               Nowadays, gemcitabine is used in combination with taxol, a paclitaxel albumin-stabilized nanoparticle
               formulation (nab-paclitaxel) that is commercially known as abraxane. Taxol is a microtubule dynamics
               inhibitor that promotes the stabilization of microtubules by preventing the catastrophe process, which
               induces cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase resulting in cell death . In preclinical studies, nab-paclitaxel
                                                                        [14]
               improved the intratumoral concentration of gemcitabine. The FDA approval for this approach was
               obtained after a phase III study that demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this combination compared to
               monotherapy with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Von Hoff et al. , randomized
                                                                                             [47]
               assigned 861 patients: 431 received nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and 430 gemcitabine alone. The median
               overall survival was 1.8 months superior in the combination group, and the survival rate was 35% in the
               nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group compared to 22% in the gemcitabine group in 1 year. Moreover, this
               combination approach increased the median progression-free survival in 1.8 months. However, despite those
               benefits rates, peripheral neuropathy and myelosuppression were increased in the group that received nab-
               paclitaxel-gemcitabine combination . De vita et al.  also confirmed the effectiveness in overall survival
                                                            [48]
                                              [47]
               and progression free survival from patients treated with the combination of gemcitabine plus nabpaclitaxel.
               Although not yet approved by the FDA as a treatment approach for pancreatic cancer, the ESPAC-4 study
               developed a phase III randomized trial that could establish the gemcitabine plus capecitabine combination
   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369