Page 24 - Read Online
P. 24

vs. 37.2%).  CLARINET trial, a double-blind, phase-III   III RADIANT-4 trial.  The  study evaluated  everolimus
                     [72]
            study, randomized 204 patients with well- or moderately   efficacy  in  patients  with  advanced,  well-differentiated
            differentiated, Octreoscan-positive, nonfunctioning GEP-  NETs of different origin and with nonfunctional disease.
            NETs to receive lanreotide depot 120 mg monthly versus   Patients in the everolimus arm of the study presented a
            placebo. SSAs therapy obtained a significant improvement   significant improvement in PFS (11.0 vs. 3.9 months).
                                                                                                           [81]
            in PFS, with a median time not reached in the experimental   Interestingly, according to subgroup analysis, the positive
            arm versus 18 months in the placebo group. The estimated   treatment effect was confirmed irrespective of the extent
            rates of PFS at 24 months were 65.1% in the lanreotide   of liver metastasis. Objective responses were recorded in
            group and 33% in the placebo group. No information on   four (2%) patients receiving everolimus and in one patient
            disease control rate was reported. [73]           (1%) receiving placebo. Disease stabilization was the best
                                                              overall response in 165 patients (81%) in the everolimus
            Recently, the clinical activity of the new SSA pasireotide   group, compared with 62 patients  (64%) in the  placebo
            has been evaluated  in an open-label,  phase-II study   group. The findings of these three studies were consistent
            enrolling advanced pancreatic and extrapancreatic Grade   with the role of everolimus in prolonging PFS and not in
            1 and 2 NETs.  Median PFS of the 29 treated patients   achieving  tumor shrinkage.  Thus, everolimus cannot be
                        [74]
            was the primary endpoint of the study and was 11 months.   proposed as a preferred therapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
            According to the RECIST criteria, one patient obtained a
            partial response and 17 experienced disease stabilization,   The activity of sunitinib, a multityrosine kinase inhibitor
            for a disease control rate of 64%. In all the above-reported   of vascular endothelial and platelet-derived growth factor
            trials, treatment with SSAs resulted in low cytoreductive   receptors, was explored  in  a  double-blind,  placebo-
            activity  as demonstrated by the low objective  response   controlled, phase-III trial enrolling 171 patients with
            rates  reported  (around  5%).  This  finding  was  recently   advanced,  well-differentiated  progressing  pancreatic
                                                                   [82]
            confirmed  in  an  extensive  review.   Thus, while SSAs   NETs.  The study met its primary endpoint, as median
                                         [75]
            can be considered the mainstay of treatment in well- or   PFS of patients receiving sunitinib was significantly longer
            moderately well-differentiated NETs, both functioning or   than  that of patients  treated  with  placebo  (11.4  vs. 5.5
            not, when a disease control is needed, there is no evidence   months). In contrast to what was observed in patients with
                                                                                [83]
            to support the use of SSAs in the “neoadjuvant” setting.  renal cell carcinoma,  tumor shrinkage rate in patients
                                                              with pancreatic NET was low; only 9% of those treated
            Targeted therapies                                with sunitinib achieved an objective response according to
            Recently, novel targeted therapies such as everolimus and   the RECIST criteria.
            sunitinib have been introduced in the clinical management
            of G1 and G2 NETs.                                The high rate of vascularization of NETs  led to initial
                                                              interest  in  angiogenesis  inhibition  as  a  promising  field
            Following exciting preclinical data demonstrating mTOR   of  research.  Furthermore,  an overexpression of vascular
            signaling pathway activation in NET cells, everolimus was   endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been observed in
            extensively studied in cancer patients. [76-78]   both carcinoid and p-NET (either in serum or in tissue),
                                                              thus  making VEGF  and VEGFR  excellent  targets  to  be
            A randomized, phase-III, double-blind study (RADIANT-3)   inhibited.  The anti-angiogenetic agent bevacizumab has
                                                                      [84]
            enrolled 410 patients with locally advanced or metastatic   been investigated combined with IFNα in a randomized
            well- to moderately  differentiated  pancreatic  NETs,   phase-II trial of 44 patients with advanced (unresectable
            comparing  the  PFS  of  patients  treated  with  everolimus   or metastatic) carcinoid tumors. Patients were randomized
            10 mg/day to that  of patients receiving  placebo.  The   to receive 18 weeks of single agent bevacizumab or IFN.
            study met  its primary  endpoint  as patients  treated  with   At  disease  progression  or  after  18  weeks  of  treatment,
            everolimus presented a longer median PFS (11.0 vs. 4.6   patients were allowed to receive the combination of these
            months). Response rate  was low, with only 5% of the   two treatments. The results obtained in the bevacizumab
            patients  randomized  to receive  everolimus  achieving  a   arm were encouraging; a partial response was achieved in
                          [79]
            partial response.  Similar encouraging results have been   18% of the patients, with a better 18-week PFS than in the
            obtained in the phase-III placebo-controlled RADIANT-2   IFN group (95% vs. 67%, respectively).  However, even
                                                                                              [85]
            study enrolling  patients  with  well-  and  moderately   though bevacizumab  monotherapy  has been associated
            differentiated  locally  advanced or metastatic  NETs and   with improvement  in response rate and survival, the
            carcinoid  syndrome.  Patients  receiving  everolimus  plus   results  obtained in  terms  of tumor  shrinkage  were  not
            SSA (octreotide LAR) presented a longer PFS than those   encouraging, probably because of the cytostatic rather than
            treated with octreotide LAR plus placebo (16.4 vs. 11.3   cytotoxic  effect  of antiangiogenic  therapies.  Therefore,
            months, P = 0.026). Overall response rate was similar in   the role of bevacizumab-based  combination  therapy has
            both groups, with 2% of patients achieving a partial response   been evaluated, mostly with chemotherapy agents or with
            and 82% disease stabilization.  The advantages of treating   mTOR inhibitors in the management of advanced GEP-
                                    [80]
            patients with everolimus have recently been confirmed in   NETs. In the randomized  phase-II study CALGB80701
            a  randomized,  double-blind, placebo-controlled,  phase-  (Alliance), patients with metastatic pNETs were randomly
            298
                                                                                                                   Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment ¦ Volume 2 ¦ August 17, 2016 ¦
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29