Page 85 - Read Online
P. 85

Page 6 of 12    Bongiovanni et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2022;8:44  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2022.78

               Table 1. Most representative clinical trials on ICIs alone or in combination
                                                  Patients
                Regimen              Trial design           Results                                   Refs.
                                                  (N°)
                IPI-NIVO vs. Chemotherapy  Phase III    605  mOS 18.1 vs. 14.1 months; HR, 0.74; P = 0.002  [10]
                                     Randomized
                                     1st line
                IPI-NIVO vs. NIVO    Phase II     125       mOS 15.9 vs. 11.9 months                  [29]
                                     Randomized
                                     2nd and further
                                     line
                IPI-NIVO             Phase II     34        SD 38%; mOS: not reached                  [30]
                                     Not-Randomized
                                     2nd and further
                                     line
                Durvalumab plus chemotherapy  Phase II trial   55  Median OS: 21.0 months             [39]
                                     Single arm
                                     1st line
                Durvalumab plus chemotherapy  Phase II trial   55  6-month PFS: 57%                   [40]
                                     Single arm
                                     1st line
                Durvalumab plus tremelimumab  Phase II trial   40   Immune-related ORR: 28% DCR 65%; mOS: 16.5 months  [28]
                                     Single arm
                                     1st line or
                                     pretreated
                NIVO                 Phase II trial   34    ORR: 29% mOS: 17.3 months                 [12]
                                     Single arm
                                     2nd and further
                                     line
                NIVO vs. Placebo     Phase II     332       mOS 9.2 months vs. 6.6 months; HR: 0.72   [23]
                                     Randomized             1-year OS: 43.4% vs. 30.1%
                                     2nd and further
                                     line
                Pembrolizumab vs. Institutional   Phase III   144  mOS 10.7 months vs. 12.4 months; HR: 1.12; P = 0.59 ORR: 22% vs.  [22]
                choice               Randomized             6% ; P = 0.004
                                     2nd and further
                                     line
                Pembrolizumab        Phase Ib     25        ORR 20%; mOS: 18 months                   [20]
                                     Single arm
                                     2nd and further
                                     line
                Tremelimumab         Phase II trial   29    ORR: 6.9% mOS: 10.7 months                [15]
                                     Single arm
                                     2nd and further
                                     Line
                Tremelimumab         Phase II trial   29    Immune-related ORR: 13.8% (4 patients)    [13]
                                     Single arm
                                     2nd and further
                                     line
                Tremelimumab vs. Placebo  Phase II   571    mOS 7.7 months vs. 7.3 months; HR: 0.92; P = 0.41  [16]
                                     Randomized
                                     2nd and further
                                     line

               NIVO: Nivolumab; IPI: ipilimumab DCR: disease control rate; DOR: duration of response; HR: hazard ratio; ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitor; MPM:
               malignant pleural mesothelioma; ORR: objective response rate; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression-free survival.


               patients with advanced MPM . A three-year survival update showed a persistent benefit in survival for
                                         [31]
                                                                                         [32]
               patients treated with ICI compared to those treated with chemotherapy (23% vs. 15%) . The benefit was
               seen across subgroups including histology. Exploratory biomarker analyses demonstrated that a high score
               on a four-gene inflammatory signature (CD8A, STAT1, LAG3, and CD274) is correlated with better
                                                                  [32]
               survival in the experimental arm than in the standard one . The CheckMate 743 results led to the Food
               and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of nivolumab and ipilimumab combination in MPM patients in
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90