Page 82 - Read Online
P. 82

Bongiovanni et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2022;8:44  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2022.78  Page 3 of 12




































                                    Figure 1. Selected most relevant studies with ICIs in mesothelioma patients.

               Targeting CTLA-4
               The phase II MESOT-TREM 2008 trial was the first study that opened the path towards this novel
               therapeutic approach. In this study, 29 pretreated MPM and peritoneal malignant mesothelioma patients
               underwent anti-CTLA-4 mAb tremelimumab therapy at the dose of 15 mg/kg every 90 days until disease
               progression or unacceptable toxicity. Although the primary endpoint was not reached due to the low ORR
               (6.9%), preliminary signs of antitumor activity were noted, in particular in terms of mOS which was 10.7
                      [13]
               months . Therefore, a second study, MESOT-TREM 2012, started. In this phase II trial, based on the
                                                              [14]
               pharmacokinetic analysis generated in previous studies , tremelimumab was given at the intensified dose
               of 10 mg/kg every four weeks for six cycles, followed by maintenance every 12 weeks. Opposite to MESOT-
               TREM-2008, in this study, the primary endpoint was reached with an immune-related ORR of 13.8% .
                                                                                                       [15]
               Moreover, the study showed a good safety profile, with grade 3-4 toxicity observed in only 7% of treated
               patients . In light of these promising results, the phase IIb, placebo-controlled, double-blind DETERMINE
                      [15]
               study started. Overall, 568 patients affected by pretreated MPM or peritoneal malignant mesothelioma were
               randomized to receive tremelimumab, given at the same intensified dose utilized in the MESOT-TREM-
               2012 study, or placebo. Unfortunately, the primary endpoint was not reached: tremelimumab failed to
               demonstrate an improvement in OS, compared to placebo (7.7 and 7.3 months, respectively; HR = 0.92;
               P = 0.41) .
                       [16]
               Targeting PD1/PDL1 axis
               The development of a second generation of immunomodulating mAb directed against the PD-1/PD-L1 axis
               aroused keen interest to explore in MPM patients because of their more promising profile in efficacy and
               safety compared to that of anti-CTLA-4 mAb in different tumor types. Thus, various phase I/II trials were
               conducted in MPM patients [11,12,17-21] . Among the most representative studies, the phase Ib Keynote 028 study
               (NCT02054806) was conducted on 25 MPM patients treated with pembrolizumab. The results show a
               response rate of 20% and a mOS of 18 months [20].
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87