Page 103 - Read Online
P. 103

Page 6 of 7       Valković et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2022;8:16  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2021.208

               would have been gained if the values of MVD and OPN expression were taken at different time points,
               regarding therapy response, so this remains a goal for our next investigation.

               It is obvious that nothing can be concluded on the bases of two cases, but this review of our two patients
               encourages us, and we hope other research groups to continue analyzing cases of extramedullary MM
               (especially in large clinical trials) and investigating various factors of the microenvironment in this
               particular type of MM, including angiogenesis and OPN. If angiogenesis were proven as an important
               pathogenetic factor in EMD, it would provide a wide range of possibilities for the treatment of the most
               aggressive forms of MM, such as EMD. The same could be true for OPN, whose biological function in MM
               and EMD should also be clarified in future research with the possibility of pharmacological inhibition of its
               biological effect.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Designed the paper and wrote the manuscript: Valković T, Stanić Damić M, Valković F
               Designed the paper, wrote the manuscript and reviewed and approved the manuscript: Jonjić N

               Availability of data and materials
               Authors declare that data and supplementary figures supporting their findings can be found in Clinical
               Hospital Center Rijeka.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               This work was supported by the Research Support of the University of Rijeka: grant No. 918.10.0104.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Written informed consent was obtained from the patients.

               Consent for publication
               Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case reports and any
               companying images.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2022.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Bansal R, Rakshit S, Kumar S. Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J 2021;11:161.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               2.       He J, Yue X, He D, et al. Multiple extramedullary-bone related and/or extramedullary extraosseous are independent poor prognostic
                   factors in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Front Oncol 2021;11:668099.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               3.       Beksac M, Seval GC, Kanellias N, et al. A real world multicenter retrospective study on extramedullary disease from Balkan Myeloma
                   study group and barcelona university: analysis of parameters that improve outcome. Haematologica 2020;105:201-8.  DOI  PubMed
                   PMC
               4.       Ribatti D, Vacca A. New insights in anti-angiogenesis in multiple myeloma. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19:2031.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               5.       Ribatti D, Nico B, Vacca A. Importance of the bone marrow microenvironment in inducing the angiogenic response in multiple
                   myeloma. Oncogene 2006;25:4257-66.  DOI  PubMed
               6.       Bastos ACSF, Blunck CB, Emerenciano M, Gimba ERP. Osteopontin and their roles in hematological malignancies: splice variants on
                   the new avenues. Cancer Lett 2017;408:138-43.  DOI  PubMed
               7.       Duletić-Načinović A, Gačić V, Valković T, et al. Concurrent elevations of VEGF, osteopontin and MCP-1 serum levels are
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108