Page 25 - Read Online
P. 25

Quartuccio et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2021;7:14  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2020.118               Page 5 of 13

                                                                                                18
               Table 1. Main characteristics of studies with patients with thyroid cancer and hematogenous metastases evaluated by  F-FDG PET/
               CT
                                       No.                         Other imaging modalities
                Authors       Years                Histotype                            Standard of reference
                                     patients                       used for comparison
                Freudenberg et al. [19]  2007  36  Papillary (21), Follicular (15)  CT  Histology, clinical follow-up
                                                                     18
                Klain et al. [20]  2020  40  Differentiated (papillary = 30) MRI,  F-FDG PET/MRI  Clinical follow-up
                Kundu et al. [21]  2015  62  Papillary (56), Follicular (6)  68 Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT  Histology, clinical follow-up
                                                                    131
                Leboulleux et al. [22]  2012  34  Papillary (32), Follicular (2),   CT,  I-WBS  Clinical follow-up
                                            Poorly differentiated (2)
                                                                     131
                Nagamachi et al. [23]  2011  70  Papillary (62), Follicular (8)  MRI,  I-WBS  Histology, clinical follow-up
                Nakajo et al. [24]  2013  20  Papillary (19), Follicular (1)  18 F-FLT PET/CT  Clinical follow-up
                Ota et al. [25]  2013  11   Papillary (4), Follicular (7)  Bone scan (planar and SPECT),  Clinical follow-up
                                                                 18 F-fluoride PET/CT
                Piccardo et al. [26]  2011  20  Papillary (12), Follicular (8)  131 I-WBS, C.I.  Clinical follow-up
                Piccardo et al. [27]  2019  25  Papillary (18), Follicular (7)  18 F-choline PET/CT  Histology, clinical follow-up
                Poisson et al. [28]  2010  20  Anaplastic        CT                    Clinical follow-up
                Qiu et al. [29]  2012  80   Papillary (37), Follicular (39),   131 I-SPECT/CT, bone scan  Histology, clinical follow-up
                                            Follicular variant of papillary
                                            (4)
                Sakurai et al. [30]  2012  23  Papillary (6), Follicular (17)  MRI     Clinical follow-up
                Shinto et al. [31]  2015  28  Papillary (10), Follicular (14),   99m Tc-Hynic TOC SPECT/CT  Clinical follow-up
                                            Hurtle cell (4)
                                                                             68
                Vrachimis et al. [33]  2016  26  Differentiated, with suspicion   18 F-FDG PET/MRI,  Ga-  Clinical follow-up
                                            or known dedifferentiation  DOTANOC PET/CT
                Vrachimis et al. [34]  2016  12  Papillary (5), Follicular (3)   68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI, MRI Histology, clinical follow-up
                                            Poorly differentiated (4)
                                                                  131
               No.: Number; CT: computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging;  I-WBS: 131-Iodium whole-body scan; C.I.: conventional
               imaging; FLT: fluorothymidine; SPECT: single photon emission computed tomography.
               Qualitative analysis (systematic review)
               The characteristics of the 15 selected studies are presented in Table 1. All these articles were single-center
               investigations, published within the last 10 years, except one (2007), by authors from Europe (n = 8) and
               Asia (n = 7). Two thirds of the studies were retrospective and one third were prospective.


               The patient sample was consistently relatively small across the studies ranging from 11 to 80. The histotype
               most represented was papillary (67%), followed by follicular (27%). Only one study recruited exclusively
               patients with anaplastic histotype.

                                                18
               In the 15 studies, patients underwent  F-FDG PET/CT scan at different moments of the diagnostic work-
                                               131
               up before or after at least one cycle of  I treatment.
               The hematogenous lesions investigated were located prevalently in bone and lung. In each study, PET was
                                                                      18
               compared with at least one imaging modality. In four studies,  F-FDG PET/CT was assessed in a head-
               to-head comparison with MRI, prevalently with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). CT was available for
                               18
               comparison with  F-FDG PET/CT in three studies. Patients underwent both PET/MRI and PET/CT in
               three studies. The standard of reference was based on clinical imaging follow-up in most studies; histology
               was adopted as additional standard of reference in six studies. The risk of bias for the studies was scored as
               low by using the QUADAS-2 [Figure 2].

                                                                                         18
               Meta-analysis: detectability of hematogenous metastatic lesions by means of  F-FDG PET/CT
                                                                                              18
               Considering the five studies (patients = 84) for which patient-based analysis was available,  F-FDG PET/
               CT detected hematogenous metastases in 85.08% (95% C.I.: 75.96%-91.75%) of cases [Figure 3].

                                                  18
               Considering the 691 lesions (14 studies),  F-FDG PET/CT showed a pooled DR of 89.70% (95%CI: 79.61%-
                                                  2
               96.62%) with substantial heterogeneity (I  = 92.84%).
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30