Page 420 - Read Online
P. 420

Page 16 of 22        Droste et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2023;9:2  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2022.94

                                                                                                      [131]
               although the pharmacodynamic analysis confirmed the target inhibition in the entinostat-treated cohort .
               Nevertheless, epigenetic modifiers open a new field of research in treating HR-positive breast cancer that
               will certainly gain importance in the future. Furthermore, preclinical data provide evidence that combining
                                                                                [134]
               entinostat with palbociclib enhances the antitumoral activity of both drugs . Further clinical studies on
               this novel and promising substance are still pending.


               CONCLUSION
               Endocrine therapeutic strategies are currently being improved and expanded by adding molecularly-
               targeted substances. These play an increasingly important role in managing advanced hormone receptor-
               positive breast cancer, particularly given the central problem of resistance to endocrine therapy. The search
               for biomarkers must be intensively pursued to individualize cancer therapies further. CDK4/6 inhibitors, in
               addition to endocrine therapy, have already become the standard of care in the first-line treatment of HR-
               positive advanced breast cancer. However, several novel promising substances (e.g., oral SERDs or PI3K
               inhibitors) are also being investigated in clinical trials, so an expansion of therapy options can be expected
               shortly. Given the rapid scientific progress, knowledge and management of adverse events are critical, as the
               new targeted agents are associated with side effects that differ significantly from endocrine therapy alone.

               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Droste A, Schmidt M


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               Marcus Schmidt has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, BioNTech, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Lilly, MSD,
               Novartis, Pantarhei Bioscience, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and SeaGen. His institution has received
               research funding from AstraZeneca, BioNTech, Eisai, Genentech, German Breast Group, Novartis, Palleos,
               Pantarhei Bioscience, Pierre Fabre, and SeaGen. In addition, he has a patent for EP 2390370 B1 and a patent
               for EP 2951317 B1 issued. Annika Droste reports no conflict of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2023.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived
                    with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of
                    disease study. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:524-48.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425