Page 92 - Read Online
P. 92

Bah et al. Intell Robot 2022;2(1):72­88  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2021.16          Page 86

































                                         Figure 10. Wrong prediction on the individual facial image.


               5. CONCLUSIONS
               This paper proposes a novel model of improved CNN architecture with Residual Blocks for Facial Expression
               Recognition. We evaluated the model on two datasets and compare it to a network without Residual Blocks.
               Theresultsprovedthattheproposedarchitectureperformedverywellwithanaccuracylevelof75%onFERGIT
               challenging dataset. With a relatively big number of parameters (9,766,391), the model achieved a state-of-the-
               art result in 48 min after running for 100 epochs.This study dataset was augmented to generate similar images
               so that the model can quickly detect the emotion on the face . Hence, our proposed model shows an overfitting
               issue during training, affecting the classification. In the future, we look forward to reducing the overfitting and
               increasing the performance by using more image pre-processing and data enhancement to tackle the occlusion
               problem. Also, introduce hybrid loss function to handle the intraclass variation problem, and work more on
               the CNN architecture like using evolutionary computation algorithms to find the best model and optimize the
               parameters.



               DECLARATIONS

               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Bah T, Yu X


               Availability of data and materials
               The FERGIT dataset is available here: https://www.kaggle.com/uldisvalainis/fergit. The CK+ dataset is avail-
               able here: https://www.kaggle.com/shawon10/ckplus.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97