Page 27 - Read Online
P. 27

Ayass et al. Intell Robot 2022;2(1):20-36  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2021.07     Page 22

               2. FLYING AD HOC NETWORK
               Ad hoc networks, referred to by the IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) as MANET (mobile ad hoc
               networks), have as their main characteristic the fact that they do not have infrastructure. As a result, all their
               functions must be performed by the devices. Thus, the devices that make up an ad hoc network must be
                                                            [1]
               able to communicate with each other acting as routers .

               Ad hoc networks are often used in scenarios where there is a need to quickly set up a network, usually
               where there is no proper infrastructure. The devices can move arbitrarily, unpredictably modifying the
               network topology, which requires a permanent adaptation and reconfiguration of routes so that the devices
               can still communicate with each other.

               In the new context of fifth-generation networks (5G), a derivation of the ad hoc networks called FANET has
               emerged. FANETs are ad hoc networks composed of remotely controlled flying devices (UAVs) that
                                        [2]
               communicate with each other . Due to the flexibility, versatility, and even easy operation of FANETs, they
               are used for both military and civil applications, for example plantation control in agriculture, forest
               clearing, and city security (see Figure 1).

               In recent years, because of technological advances in areas such as robotics, telecommunications, and
               computer networks, UAVs have emerged as alternatives in civil and military areas, providing several
               applications. Thus, UAVs are intended to improve or create a network infrastructure in places that are
               difficult to access, such as natural disaster areas or enemy territories. With this, FANET appears as an
               acceptable solution in this new context, allowing the collection of information in a flexible, fast, and reliable
               way.

               One of the goals of FANETs is to create a cooperative network, using multiple UAVs to cover an area that
               cannot be covered by a single UAV. Thus, it is possible to create an aerial mesh network in which its devices
               (drones) communicate and transmit information with each other. Therefore, it is necessary to have reliable
               and stable communication between devices to maintain good levels of quality of service/quality of
               experience (QoS/QoE).


               In FANETs, the mobility index is much higher than a traditional ad hoc network, leading to frequent
               topology changes. This is the reason FANETs must be self-configuring and self-organizing. Such a network
               must be prepared for sudden changes in its topology, organization, and even communication.


               The mobility of UAVs and their spatial location are also very important for determining communication
               routes. With the motion, these routes are usually remade to continue with the interconnection of the UAVs.
               For this reason, routing must be done dynamically, and the routing protocol must be efficient and simple,
               increasing the autonomy of the UAVs and reducing the delay in data delivery between the drones.

               UAVs are responsible for overflying the environment. They have sensors to collect information and can
               establish communication with each other more easily by finding fewer obstacles in their line of sight,
               reducing the number of UAVs needed to cover a certain area. However, weather conditions can impair
               communication due to wind, rain, and other factors.


               FANETs have a high computational power. Thus, they have a greater capacity for transmitting information
               since in many cases they are responsible for transmitting information in real time (with videos from the
               monitored environment). Thus far, there are no specific routing protocols for FANETs. Traditional
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32