Page 913 - Read Online
P. 913

Page 10 of 22                                     Mantovani et al. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:78  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.75

                Targher et al. [126]  Cross-sectional study: 400  QTc interval on   US  NAFLD associated with   Italy
                             outpatients with T2DM  electrocardiograms        increased QTc interval in
                                                                              patients after adjusting
                                                                              for multiple established
                                                                              risk factors and potential
                                                                              confounders
                Mantovani et al. [127]  Cross-sectional study: 751  Cardiac conduction defects US  Patients with NAFLD   Italy
                             hospitalized patients with                       had a remarkably higher
                             T2DM                                             prevalence of any persistent
                                                                              heart block than those
                                                                              without NAFLD (31.3 vs.
                                                                              16.7%, P < 0.001)
                Mantovani et al. [56]  Cross-sectional study: 330  Ventricular arrhythmias   US  NAFLD was independently  Italy
                             outpatients with T2DM   were defined as the      associated with an increased
                             who had undergone 24-h   presence of non-sustained   risk of prevalent ventricular
                             Holter monitoring for   ventricular tachycardia,   arrhythmias
                             clinical reasons   >30 premature ventricular
                                                complexes per hour, or
                                                both
               HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; NAFLD: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus; US: ultrasound

               independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in NAFLD patients with cirrhosis [119,120] . Specifically, T2DM is
               associated with important complications of cirrhosis, such as renal dysfunction, ascites, bacterial infections
               and hepatic encephalopathy [119,120] . Lastly, the management of patients with concurrent diabetes mellitus and
               liver disease has been also addressed [119,120] . Accumulating findings suggest a beneficial effect of metformin
               in patients with chronic liver diseases [119,120] . Insulin is often required in patients with advanced cirrhosis.
               However, the favorable impact of controlling diabetes mellitus in NAFLD patients with cirrhosis has not
               been clearly demonstrated yet [119,120] . Importantly, given that NAFLD has become one of the most important
               indications for liver transplantation, the management of multiple metabolic co-morbidities, including
               T2DM and obesity, are strongly recommended in the pre- and peri-transplant period [128] .

               An increased prevalence and incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been observed in the last
               two decades worldwide. Although most cases of HCC are due to chronic infection with viral hepatitis,
               recent prospective studies have clearly documented that there is a close association between T2DM,
                                           [1]
               NAFLD/NASH and risk of HCC . For instance, in a USA population-based longitudinal study, enrolling
               approximately 4,400 cases of HCC with a median follow-up of 6 years, Sanyal et al. [121]  documented that
               the most common risk factor for HCC was NAFLD (59%), followed by T2DM (36%) and HCV chronic
               infection (22%). Almost identical results were observed in a small cross-sectional study of 162 adults
               with HCC [122] . In that study, Ertle et al. [122]  found that NAFLD was the most frequent etiology for HCC.
               Importantly, studies have also suggested that the prevalence of HCC is higher in T2DM patients with
               NAFLD and that the coexistence of NAFLD and T2DM markedly increases the risk of developing HCC [129-131] .


               The presence of T2DM and NAFLD seems to be also associated with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
               (ICC). In a recent meta-analysis of 6 cohort and nested case-control studies, Petrick et al. [132]  reported
               that diabetes mellitus was associated with a 53% increased risk of ICC (RR 1.53, 95% confidence interval
               1.31-1.78; I  = 67%). In another study with a total of 6,093 cholangiocarcinoma cases (ICC: n = 4,695;
                         2
               extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: n = 1,396) and 60,906 age- and sex-matched controls, the patients with
               ICC and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were more likely to have diabetes mellitus (adjusted odds ratio
               1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.39 and 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.85, respectively) than
               controls [133] .


               NAFLD and risk of macro- and microvascular complications in patients with diabetes mellitus
               In the last decade, several observational studies documented that in patients with and without diabetes
               mellitus, NAFLD (as detected by imaging or liver biopsy) is associated with: (1) an increased risk of fatal
   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918