Page 294 - Read Online
P. 294

Page 6 of 13                                               Harrod et al. Hepatoma Res 2019;5:28  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2019.15





                         33.3% HCV relapse prior to   transplant  86% SVR across all groups  cirrhosis with or without HCC  70% SVR12 achieved  post-transplant SVR  93% of the 46 patients that  underwent liver transplant had  from 24 to 48 weeks HCV RNA < 25IU/mL at the time  of transplant, but 30% of these   relapsed.  54% SVR in cases with active   SVR12 93% overall, but 82% in   pre-transplant 91.9% SVR in non-HCC patient  lowest in genotype 3 patients Non-significant
                   Outcome         92% SVR in compensated cirrhosis  with HCC vs 83% in decompensated   Of all 61 patients, 49% maintained   15% treatment failure, with 93% of  these cases having active tumour  tumour, 97% SVR in treated HCC  patients with concomitant HCC - this  did not reach statistical significance.  94% SVR post-transplant, 74% SVR   Highest SVR in genotype 1 patients,   improved SVR rates in treated HCC   83.1% SVR in HCC (vs 90.3% non-  Adverse effe








                      Treatment Duration  12-32 weeks  Not specified  Up to 24 weeks   or liver transplant,   whichever came   first. Latterly   protocol changed   due to observed   relapses.  Not specified;   the authors   classified regimens   as adequate or   inadequate  8-24 weeks  8-24 weeks  Variable  12 weeks







                     Treatment   Regimen  regimens   used  Variable  Sofosbuvir +   Ribavirin  Multiple   regimens   used  Sofosbuvir-  based   Multiple   regimens   used  Not specified  Ombitasvir/   paritaprevir/   ritonavir and   dasabuvir







                   DAA therapy  HCC vs HCV Treatment   timing Pre-transplant patients, some Multiple  had received HCC treatment   prior to HCV treatment  though exact timings unclear  Pre-transplant patients at  decompensated with the start of HCV therapy, no  bridging HCC therapy given   prior to HCV treatment  Pre-transplant patients,  no comment on prior or  subsequent bridging HCC   therapy  Mixture of treated and  untreated HCC, with 43% of  patients with active tum









                   Patient characteristics  Cirrhosis  Genotype  All cirrhotic, 52%   71%   CPA  genotype 1  All cirrhotic, 72%   73%   genotype 1  or without HCC,   28% compensated   with HCC  All CPA cirrhotic  73%   genotype 1  All cirrhotic, 81%   85%   CPA genotype 1  50% cirrhotic  64.5%   genotype 1  85% cirrhotic  73%   genotype 1  All cirrhotic  78%   genotype 1  Unclear, at least 1   100%   non-cirrhotic patient  genotype   1b









                 Table 1. Studies assessing DAAs in HCC patients [35-38,52,69,78,79]

                     Study characteristics  Retrospective study assessing  pre transplant HCV HCC, n = 21   with both HCC & HCV  Retrospective study assessing  delisting of patients post DAA  therapy, n = 116 with HCC & HCV  (also n = 122 HCV  without HCC)  Prospective study assessing  efficacy of Sof/Riba in pre- transplant HCV HCC, n = 61 with  HCC & HCV (also n = 122 HCV    without HCC)  Retrospective study comparing  SVR in HCV with vs without  HCC, n = 135 with HCC &

















                     First author  Saberi et al. [35] ,2017  Pascasio et al. [52] ,2017  Curry et al. [78] , 2015  Prenner et al. [37] , 2017  Chang et al. [79] ,2017  Beste et al. [36] , 2017  Radhakrishnan et al. [38] ,   2017  Revuelta-Herrero et al. [69] ,   2018
   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299