Page 88 - Read Online
P. 88

Wada et al. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:8  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2017.39                                                   Page 5 of 8


               Table 3. Predictive factors for post-progression survival
                                                             Univariate                 Multivariate
                Variables
                                                       HR (95% CI)     P value    HR (95% CI)    P value
                Age, year               ≥ 75          1.11 (0.72-1.66)  0.64
                Gender                  Male          1.07 (0.67-1.79)  0.79
                Hepatitis B infection   Yes           0.95 (0.56-1.53)  0.84
                Hepatitis C infection   Yes           0.87 (0.58-1.32)  0.5
                Impairment of PS        ≥ +1 point    2.14 (1.45-3.17)  < 0.001   1.81 (1.16-2.82)  0.01
                                        ≥ +2 points   8.54 (4.31-16.12)  < 0.001  1.12 (0.47-2.62)  0.79
                Impairment of Child-Pugh score  ≥ +1 point  2.21 (1.48-3.28)  < 0.001  1.10 (0.64-1.99)  0.73
                                        ≥ +2 points   4.82 (2.93-7.68)   < 0.001  3.70 (1.68-8.15)  < 0.01
                Extrahepatic spread     Yes           1.4 (0.94-2.08)   0.15
                Macrovascular invasion  Yes           2.01 (1.25-3.13)  0.03      1.08 (0.58-1.96)  0.80
                BCLC stage              C             1.83 (1.19-2.90)  < 0.01    1.33 (0.80-2.23)  0.27
                Radiological progression pattern  Growth + new  3.21 (2.09-4.91)  < 0.001  2.91 (1.79-4.76)  < 0.001
                Time to tumor progression  < 4 months  2.25 (1.52-3.35)  < 0.001  1.87 (1.21-2.91)  0.01
                Second-line treatment post-PD  Yes    0.12 (0.07-0.20)  < 0.001   0.16 (0.08-0.32)  < 0.001
                Contiunuous sorafenib treatment   Yes  0.67 (0.45-0.98)  0.04     1.76 (1.06-3.00)  0.03
                post-PD
                Decline of serum AFP level 2 weeks   > 20%  1.19 (0.72-1.89)  0.48
                after starting sorafenib
               BCLC: Barcelona Clinical Liver Cancer; AFP: a-fetoprotein; PD: progressive disease; PS: performance status; HR: hazard ratio; CI:
               confidence interval

               lesion, respectively. Of 34 patients with BCLC-B, 4 progressed to BCLC-C at the time of confirmation of
               radiologic PD based on new extrahepatic spread (n = 3) or occurrence of a portal tumor thrombus (n = 1).

               Prediction of PPS
               Univariate analysis revealed a significant correlation between PPS and the following parameters in
               patients with radiologic PD: impairments in the PS score of ≥ +1 and ≥ +2 points, a Child-Pugh score
               of 8, impairments in the Child-Pugh score of ≥ +1 and ≥ +2 points, macrovascular invasion, radiologic
               patterns of progression, a TTP of ≤ 4 months, subsequent treatment post-PD, and continuous sorafenib
               treatment post-PD [Table 3]. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent predictors of PPS in
               patients with radiologic PD: impairment in the PS score of ≥ +1 point [hazard ratio (HR) 1.81, 95% CI 1.16-
               2.82], impairment in the Child-Pugh score of ≥ +2 points (HR 3.70, 95% CI 1.68-8.15), radiologic pattern
               of progression (target lesion growth and emergence of a new lesion) (HR 2.91, 95% CI 1.79-2.91), a TTP <
               4 months (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.21-2.91), second-line treatment after radiologic confirmation of PD (HR 0.16,
               95% CI 0.08-0.32), and continuous sorafenib treatment after radiologic confirmation of PD (HR 1.76, 95% CI
               1.06-3.00) [Table 3].


               DISCUSSION
               In our analysis of 128 patients with advanced HCC, we found impairment in the PS score of ≥ +1,
               impairment in the Child-Pugh score of ≥ +2, a TTP < 4 months, radiologic progression pattern, second-
               line treatment after radiologic confirmation of PD, and continuous sorafenib treatment after radiologic
               confirmation of PD were predictors of PPS. Time-dependent changes in these clinical parameters played an
               important role in predicting PPS.


                                                                                                       [18]
                                                                          [16]
                                                                                  [17]
               PPS has been shown to be associated with OS in patients with lung , breast , and colorectal cancer .
               Recently, a correlation between PPS and OS was also shown in patients with HCC [19,20] . However, to the
               best of our knowledge, few investigations have assessed the role of dynamic and time-dependent changes in
               clinical characteristics in the prediction of PPS.
               Based on the findings of this study, patients with advanced HCC can be referred for second-line treatment at
               confirmation of PD during sorafenib treatment. Our findings also imply that observing disease progression
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93