Page 71 - Read Online
P. 71

Buonfiglioli et al. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:6  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2017.42                                           Page 3 of 6


               Regardless of these discrepancies, it is possible to review the published results to draw some conclusions, but
               a few statements need to be addressed at first: (1) the concept of incidence; (2) the characteristics of the study
               population; (3) the starting point and the ending point of the observation period; and (4) the distribution of
               events during the follow-up.

               Incidence is a measure of the probability of occurrence of a given condition in a population within a
               specified period. The incidence rate is the number of new cases per population at risk in a given time period.
               From this concept derives that to analyse the incidence rate of HCC after DAA therapy it is fundamental to
               define both the exact starting point and the exact ending point of the observation period. Only if these time
               points are comparable, different study results can be compared.

               The study population should be at risk of developing the medical condition. Therefore, the risk should be
               comparable among different study groups before performing any comparison. Since in HCV-related liver
               disease HCC occurs almost exclusively in patients with liver cirrhosis, the population at risk should include
               only patients with advanced liver fibrosis (F4 according to the METAVIR classification).


               In analysing the incidence rate of HCC after DAA therapy, we must distinguish between analysing the new
               de novo occurrence of HCC and the recurrence of a new HCC in patients with prior history of successfully
               treated HCC. In the former situation, the starting point should be the end of DAA therapy, in the latter, we
               must distinguish between considering as a starting point the time of the previous HCC treatment or the end
               of DAA treatment. In all cases, the ending point should be defined after DAA therapy end, and the interval
               from the starting point must be clearly assessed.

               Another important point is the distribution of events (HCC) during the follow-up. It is known that during
               the natural history of liver cirrhosis the development of de novo incident HCC is not clustered around any
                               [12]
               specific time point . Similarly, HCC recurrence is generally not clustered around specific time points, even
                                                                                                     [6]
               if recurrence rate is higher during the first two years after curative treatment of the neoplastic nodule . For
               this reason, the median interval between DAA therapy and HCC diagnosis needs to be analysed to assess the
               latency period between exposure to DAA therapy and HCC development.


               WHAT PUBLISHED STUDIES TELL US
               In Table 1, we have summarized the results of the principal studies addressing the de novo occurrence and/or
               recurrence of HCC in HCV-infected patients, with compensated liver cirrhosis, who have been treated with
               DAA therapy. Due to the heterogeneity of the study populations and the different observation periods, any
               formal meta-analysis seems of limited utility to draw any sound conclusion. It seems more important to note
               some common and peculiar aspects of the results.

               At first, we must differentiate between the de novo occurrence of new HCC in cirrhotic patients without
               prior history of HCC and recurrence of HCC in patients with previously treated HCC. In studies analysing
               the former group of patients, the observation period after DAA therapy ranged a median of 6 to 14 months,
               indicating a relatively short follow-up. Despite this short observation period, de novo HCC occurred in 1.5%
               to 3.9% of patients. If we consider an expected annual rate of 2% to 3% in these subjects, we can conclude
               that HCC occurrence is certainly not reduced after DAA treatment. On the other hand, we have not strong
               elements to assume that the occurrence rate is increased, without a control group. Therefore, the argument
               of the incidence rate of new HCC after DAA therapy remains unsettled without a definite conclusion. In any
               case, a real increased annual incidence rate of HCC does not seem to happen after DAA treatment.

               More intriguing data come from the studies on the recurrence of HCC after DAA treatment. The analysis
               of the recurrence rate must take into account the interval since previous HCC treatment, due to the higher
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76