Page 70 - Read Online
P. 70

Calinescu et al. Hepatoma Res 2021;7:59  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2021.26  Page 5 of 17

               requirements for transfusions.


               Secondly, temporary portocaval shunting could maintain renal perfusion pressure, which might contribute
               to the preservation of the postoperative renal function as well as diminish the splanchnic congestion of HBL
               patients that do not have portosystemic collaterals and thus increase the likelihood of an optimal healing of
               the Roux en Y loop . In this series investigating the early inflow exclusion, a recurrence free survival rate of
                               [48]
                                                                              [48]
               88.9% at one year with preservation of residual renal function was obtained .
               Finally, an extensive en bloc hepatectomy technique was described in a series with excision of retrocaval
               retroperitoneal tissue, en bloc lymphadenectomy with peri-choledochal and hepatic hilum nodules along
               the common hepatic artery, and frozen section from all resection margins; the overall survival in this seven-
               patient series was 100% without recurrence seven years after LT .
                                                                    [49]

               Timing of liver transplantation and metastasectomy for hepatoblastoma
               The timing of LT should not be delayed after four weeks after the last course of chemotherapy given the
               impact on survival; if an expeditious access to deceased donation is not possible, a living related donation
               should be considered [33,39] . A possible option for those who are waiting for a liver from a deceased donor is to
               plan a new course of chemotherapy if they are not transplanted during the first window of four weeks; these
               cases are of course not offered a graft during chemotherapy, but this strategy allows a second window of
               transplantability of one month, after the new course. The latter strategy imposes of course that not all
               chemotherapy courses are done before the registration of the patient on the list for transplant, but it has
               been very effective in avoiding exposing the patient to prolonged periods with no chemotherapy and
               allowing a LT within these time windows.


               Children’s Oncology Group recommendations in 2016 stated that evaluation for surgery should be done
                                                       [50]
               after two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy ; nevertheless, some tumors continue to regress between
               Cycles 3 and 4. Thus, after four rounds of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 45% of the tumors are down staged,
               vs. only 30% after two cycles; thus, if chemotherapy is well tolerated, it should be continued to allow more
               patients to undergo successful resections .
                                                 [51]

               Clearance for metastasis should be achieved earlier in the chemotherapy course, with SIOPEL 4
               recommendations to achieve metastatic control after three induction cycles of chemotherapy .
                                                                                             [17]
               Complications after liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma
               Morbidity  after  LT  in  HBL  might  arise  from  three  origins:  (1)  chemotherapy  toxicity,  namely
               nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and sepsis with early discontinuation of adjuvant treatment; (2) surgical
               morbidity; and (3) immunosupression .
                                               [50]

               At transplantation, the renal function of patients with HBL is reduced because of the toxicity of neoadjuvant
               chemotherapy; although it can be expected, it has been clearly emphasized that the renal function further
               deteriorates after LT [52,53] . As the cause for further decline of renal function after LT is directly caused by the
               sequential and combined toxic effects of chemotherapy and immunosuppression, the strategy has been to
               use either lower anticalcineurin levels for these patients (compared to standard LT in other indications) [33,53]
               or low-dose anticalcineurin treatment in association with other immunosuppressives (i.e., mycophenolate
               mofetil)  or early conversion to mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors .
                      [54]
                                                                               [55]
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75