Page 38 - Read Online
P. 38

Hokuto et al. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:81                             Hepatoma Research
               DOI: 10.20517/2394-5079.2020.78




               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Current status of laparoscopic repeat liver resection
               for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma



               Daisuke Hokuto, Takeo Nomi, Takahiro Yoshikawa, Yasuko Matsuo, Naoki Kamitani, Masayuki Sho

               Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Takeo Nomi, Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara-shi, Nara 634-
               8522, Japan. E-mail: t.nomi45@gmail.com

               How to cite this article: Hokuto D, Nomi T, Yoshikawa T, Matsuo Y, Kamitani N, Sho M. Current status of laparoscopic repeat liver
               resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:81. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.78

               Received: 8 Aug 2020    First Decision: 11 Sep 2020    Revised: 24 Sep 2020    Accepted: 16 Oct 2020    Published: 6 Nov 2020

               Academic Editor: Ho-Seong Han    Copy Editor: Cai-Hong Wang    Production Editor: Jing Yu


               Abstract
               Repeat liver resection (RLR) is an effective treatment approach for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and
 Received:     First Decision:     Revised:     Accepted:    Published:    can provide acceptable long-term outcomes in select patients. Recent randomized controlled trials comparing
               RLR with radiofrequency ablation revealed that the latter approach was associated with a higher rate of early
 Science Editor:     Copy Editor:     Production Editor: Jing Yu   recurrence compared with RLR. With recent advances in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), RLR has been
               increasingly performed using laparoscopy. Several propensity score-matched studies reported that laparoscopic
               RLR achieved lower blood loss and shorter hospital stays compared to open RLR. However, laparoscopic RLR
               requires more advanced techniques because of adhesions formed after the previous liver resection, changes
               in anatomical landmarks, and deformity of the remnant liver. The recently described difficulty classification of
               laparoscopic RLR is based on five factors including type of previous liver resection (open or laparoscopic), number
               of previous liver resections, surgical procedure used in previous liver resections, tumor location in previous liver
               resections, and difficulty score of LLR for recurrent HCC. We reviewed the available literature to summarize
               available evidence suggesting that laparoscopic RLR might be considered a more minimally invasive surgical
               treatment approach for recurrent HCC as long as the indication for laparoscopic RLR is carefully determined.


               Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma, repeat liver resection, laparoscopic repeat liver resection



               INTRODUCTION
               Repeat liver resection (RLR) is an effective treatment approach for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma
                                                                              [1-3]
               (HCC) and can provide acceptable long-term outcomes for select patients . However, RLR is considered
                           © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                        www.hrjournal.net
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43