Page 32 - Read Online
P. 32

Morise. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:79                                   Hepatoma Research
               DOI: 10.20517/2394-5079.2020.76




               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Current status of laparoscopic repeat liver resection
               for hepatocellular carcinoma



               Zenichi Morise

               Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki AICHI 444-0827, Japan.
               Correspondence to: Prof. Zenichi Morise, Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Okazaki Medical
               Center, Gotanda Harisakicho Okazaki, Okazaki AICHI 444-0827, Japan. E-mail: zmorise@fujita-hu.ac.jp

               How to cite this article: Morise Z. Current status of laparoscopic repeat liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoma
               Res 2020;6:79. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.76

               Received: 4 Aug 2020    First Decision: 4 Sep 2020    Revised: 12 Sep 2020    Accepted: 21 Sep 2020    Published: 6 Nov 2020

               Academic Editor: Ho-Seong Han    Copy Editor: Cai-Hong Wang    Production Editor: Jing Yu


               Abstract
               Although liver resection (LR) is often adopted to recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas, risks of complications and
               conversion reportedly increase in laparoscopic repeat LR (LRLR). The indication is not agreed upon even with the
 Received:     First Decision:     Revised:     Accepted:    Published:
               recent advances of laparoscopic LR. We conducted an international propensity score matching study of LRLR
 Science Editor:     Copy Editor:     Production Editor: Jing Yu   and open repeat LR for hepatocellular carcinoma with 1,582 patients from 42 world centers. Propensity-score
               matched LRLR patients have smaller blood loss and longer operation time than open repeat LR patients. Median
               overall survival time was 8.94 years in open and 12.55 years in LRLR; although the difference was not significant,
               the P-value was 0.0855 and the better curve of LRLR is clearly separated from that of open. In our institution, we
               experienced 34 LRLR and 12 cases of three times or more repeat LR until 2019. There are no significant differences
               in operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, conversion, and morbidity rates among first, second, and third or higher
               laparoscopic LR, which is different from the open situation. However, postoperative bile leakage and intraoperative
               bleeding causing conversion did happen in the cases with repeat extended exposure of Glissonian pedicle. LRLR
               is feasible for selected patients. However, the procedure is under developing stage and further accumulation of
               experiences and evaluation are needed.

               Keywords: Laparoscopic liver resection, hepatocellular carcinoma, re-do surgery




               INTRODUCTION
               Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can occur in multifocal and metachronous style with the neoplastic
                                                                                                       [1,2]
               background with chronic liver diseases. Repeat liver resection (LR) is often required for the condition .
                           © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                        www.hrjournal.net
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37