Page 82 - Read Online
P. 82

Osho et al. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:55  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.42                                            Page 11 of 15

               SUMMARY
               Imaging has played a significant role in the advancements of surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment of HCC.
               Across all professional societies, ultrasound is the most recognized imaging modality for HCC screening
               among at-risk patients. CT and MRI are currently not recommended for surveillance given similar
               sensitivities as ultrasound and cost-effectiveness, but recent trials are studying abbreviated MRI protocols
               for surveillance. Non-invasive diagnosis of HCC relies heavily on CT and MRI with application of the
               LI-RADS in classifying suspicious lesions for HCC. PET imaging is best utilized to identify extrahepatic
               metastases but has poor performance for diagnosis of primary HCC. CEUS has also been studied for its
               role in HCC diagnosis and is currently accepted as a second line imaging modality in most professional
               societies. Imaging with CT and MRI has also been shown to be effective in monitoring treatment response,
               with most centers using RECIST or mRECIST for trial analysis.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Conception of manuscript: Singal AG
               Drafting of manuscript: Osho A, Rich NE
               Critical revisions of manuscript: Rich NE, Singal AG
               Administrative support: Singal AG


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               Dr. Singal’s research is supported in part by NIH (R01 CA212008, and R01 CA222900). The content is
               solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National
               Institutes of Health.

               Conflicts of interest
               Dr. Singal AG has served on advisory boards or as consultant for Genentech, Bayer, Eisai, Exelixis, BMS,
               Merck, Wako Diagnostics, Glycotest, Exact Sciences, Roche, and TARGET Pharmasolutions. Other authors
               declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.

               REFERENCE
               1.   Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and
                   mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424.
               2.   Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, Zhu AX, Finn RS, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018
                   Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018;68:723-50.
               3.   European Association for the Study of the Liver. European association for the study of the liver. EASL Clinical practice guidelines:
                   management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2018;69:182-236.
               4.   Zhang BH, Yang BH, Tang ZY. Randomized controlled trial of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
                   2004;130:417-22.
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87