Page 56 - Read Online
P. 56

Yamaguchi et al. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:50                          Hepatoma Research
               DOI: 10.20517/2394-5079.2018.68




               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma


               Shun Yamaguchi , Taichiro Kosaka , Susumu Eguchi
                              #
                                             #
               Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 8528102, Japan.
               # Authors contributed equally.

               Correspondence to: Dr. Susumu Eguchi, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences,
               Sakamoto1-7-1, Nagasaki 8528102, Japan. E-mail: sueguchi@nagasaki-u.ac.jp

               How to cite this article:  Yamaguchi  S, Kosaka T,  Eguchi S.  Hepatic resection  for  hepatocellular  carcinoma.  Hepatoma  Res
               2018;4:50. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2018.68

               Received: 25 May 2018    First Decision: 16 Jul 2018    Revised: 31 Jul 2018    Accepted: 1 Aug 2018    Published: 22 Aug 2018
               Science Editor: Guang-Wen Cao    Copy Editor: Jun-Yao Li    Production Editor: Cai-Hong Wang



               Abstract
               Hepatic resection has become the standard treatment of primary liver cancer. Indications for hepatic resection in
               patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) vary greatly between Japan and other countries because the clinical
               practice guidelines for HCC defined by the Japan Society of Hepatology differ from the EASL-EORTC clinical practice
               guidelines. Hepatic resection is not recommended as a treatment for the patients at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)
               stage B. Otherwise, there are many surgeons/clinicians who believe that not all HCC patients at BCLC stage B should be
               excluded from an indication for hepatectomy because many reports showed good prognosis after hepatic resection for
               HCC patients over BCLC stage B. The survival rate is expected to increase with better outcomes of hepatectomy in the
               future. This paper has described indications for hepatectomy for patients with HCC through comparison of domestic
               guidelines with overseas guidelines, focusing on their differences.

               Keywords: Hepatic resection, hepatocellular carcinoma, guidelines



               INTRODUCTION
               Indications for surgical resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) vary greatly between
               Japan and other countries. This is because many Japanese medical institutions decide on the indication
               based on the clinical practice guidelines for HCC defined by the Japan Society of Hepatology , which differs
                                                                                             [1]
               from the EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines  in terms of the HCC stage, and the hepatic reserve
                                                           [2]
               as an indication for hepatectomy. This paper compares both guidelines in terms of surgical resection for
               hepatocellular carcinoma.


                           © The Author(s) 2018. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                        www.hrjournal.net
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61