Page 99 - Read Online
P. 99

Franco et al. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:74  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2018.94                                            Page 3 of 18


               Table 1. Benefits of hepatitis C cure by scaling-up direct-acting antivirals
                Primary prevention                         Cirrhosis among patients with chronic infection
                Clinical                                   Decreased liver inflammation
                                                           Reduced rates of liver fibrosis progression
                                                           Cirrhosis regression
                                                           Potential improvement in portal hypertension and ESLD
                                                           Improved management of extra-hepatic manifestations
                                                           Reductions in insulin resistance
                                                           Improved energy, cognition and quality of life measures
                Secondary prevention                       HCC among cirrhotic patients
                                                           Liver-related mortality and liver transplantation
                                                           AI disorders, PCT, B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
                                                           All-cause mortality
                Public health                              Expanded cure to special patient populations with unmet needs
                                                           Cure access to hard-to-reach populations (PWIDs, homeless)
                                                           Scale-up programs with disease eradication goals
                Societal                                   Cost-effectiveness potential
                                                           Direct and indirect economic impact
                                                           Awareness of patients, families, providers and health systems
                                                           Reductions in stigma
                                                           Integration and expansion of harm reduction programs
               ESLD: end-stage liver disease; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; AI: auto-immune; PCT: porphyria cutanea tarda; PWIDs: people who inject
               drugs

               analysis studies, however, demonstrated that (1) HCV cure following DAA therapy in patients with cirrhosis
               reduces HCC risk to a similar extent as interferon (IFN)-based cure (estimated at 63%-77% reduction); and
               (2) the beneficial impact on HCC incidence should be markedly higher in the DAA era, given the greater
               extent that cirrhosis populations are treated with DAAs, and the higher cure rates among these high risk
                      [65]
               patients . Expanded use of DAAs will solidify the evidence in favor of decreased HCC risk following DAA-
               based virologic cure, as exemplified by the study findings of Backus et al. , which showed a 83.5% reduction
                                                                            [66]
               in HCC diagnosis following DAA therapy.

               Applying interferon-based HCV therapy among people who inject drugs (PWID) was extremely challeng-
               ing due to patient, provider, health system, structural, and societal barriers [67-69] . The availability of DAA
               therapies with cure rates > 95% have overcome many of these barriers for PWID as they have fewer psychi-
               atric side effects, are simpler (oral, once-daily vs. weekly injections), and shorter in duration. In earlier years,
                                                                                    [70]
               interferon-based therapy had been proved to be safe and effective among PWID , and results of several
               recent studies have provided substantial insight about DAA use among several PWID subgroups. Among
               people receiving opioid substitution therapy (OST) with no recent illicit drug use, post-hoc analyses of phase
               2 and 3 trials of DAA therapy have demonstrated that the SVR is similar in those receiving and not receiv-
               ing OST [71-75] . In the first phase 3 trial to evaluate DAA therapy in people receiving OST, including those with
               ongoing drug use, treatment completion was 96%, 97% demonstrated > 95% adherence, and the overall SVR
                      [71]
               was 91% . Real-world results, among people with a history of injecting drug use (with and without recent
               drug use), indicated overall treatment completion rates of 93%-100% and SVR rates of 80%-96% [76-79] . In stud-
               ies focused on people with recent injecting drug use, 95%-96% of participants completed therapy with SVR
               rates of 93%-94% [80,81] . Mathematical modelling adds further support to this strong body of evidence. Ac-
               cording to these models, modest scale-up of DAA treatment to 8 per 100 PWID years could lead to substan-
               tial reductions in HCV prevalence within these populations, thereby preventing transmission and lowering
               HCV incidence [82,83] . Guidelines from the World Health Organization (WHO), the American Association for
               the Study of Liver Disease/Infectious Diseases Society of America, the European Association for the Study of
               the Liver, and the International Network for Hepatitis in Substance Users now recommend DAA treatment
               for PWID [84-87] .


               While associations between virologic cure and decreased the risk of liver disease-related death have been
               established during the interferon-era, all-cause mortality is still the most definite clinical end point with
                                                                                                   [50]
               clear interpretation, and an important parameter in considering efforts for DAA treatment scale-up . Van
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104