Page 18 - Read Online
P. 18

Naeem et al. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:18                              Hepatoma Research
               DOI: 10.20517/2394-5079.2018.22




               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Ablative techniques in hepatocellular carcinoma
               treatment



               Ehsun Naeem, Shahab Abid

               Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
               Correspondence to: Prof. Shahab Abid, Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Stadium
               Road P.O Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan. E-mail: shahab.abid@aku.edu

               How to cite this article: Naeem E, Abid S. Ablative techniques in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:18.
               http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2018.22

               Received: 17 Mar 2018    First Decision: 22 Mar 2018    Revised: 8 May 2018    Accepted: 17 May 2018    Published: 13 Jun 2018
               Science Editor: Guang-Wen Cao    Copy Editor: Jun-Yao Li    Production Editor: Cai-Hong Wang



               Abstract
               Hepatocellular carcinoma has been known to arise commonly in the setting of chronic liver disease. Due to its association
               with cirrhosis, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma often present with markedly diminished hepatic functional reserve,
               making them poor surgical candidates. For such patients, image-guided percutaneous ablative modalities have provided
               a viable alternate curative therapy. Although treatment allocation is a decision based on a number of factors, patients
               eligible for percutaneous ablation generally include those with early stage disease, hepatocellular carcinoma with disease
               limited to the liver and no extra-hepatic metastases. While percutaneous ethanol injection is the seminal technique,
               newer developments have led to it being replaced by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation as the most commonly
               employed procedure, due to a better efficacy as well as safety profile. Other ablative modalities including microwave
               ablation, laser ablation and cryotherapy are not as widely available. Furthermore, data comparing their effectiveness with
               well-established procedures like radiofrequency ablation is limited.


               Keywords: Barcelona Clinic liver Cancer staging, chronic liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, Milan Criteria,
               percutaneous ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation, surgical resection



               INTRODUCTION
               The past two decades have seen percutaneous ablation emerge as an exciting new therapeutic approach for
               the treatment of hepatic malignancies worldwide. While surgery is still regarded as the mainstay of therapy
               for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), high tumor burden and reduced hepatic functional reserve, as often
               encountered in such patients, precludes surgical resection in a significant proportion of patients . For such
                                                                                                [1]

                           © The Author(s) 2018. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                        www.hrjournal.net
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23