Page 132 - Read Online
P. 132

An et al. Hepatoma Res 2023;9:43  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2023.60  Page 9 of 12

               CONCLUSION
               Locoregional treatments, including TACE and TARE, have demonstrated clinical efficacy and safety in
               numerous retrospective studies in the context of non-resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Both
               TACE and TARE have been shown to provide an additional survival benefit in the setting of concomitant
               systemic chemotherapy and should be considered in the first-line setting in combination with systemic
               chemotherapy or in chemotherapy-refractory patients. However, the lack of quality data from well-
               controlled, prospective trials limits the ability to drive formal recommendations for these interventions in
               the context of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.


               Based on currently available data, there is no clinically significant difference in efficacy between TARE and
               TACE for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. A systemic review performed by Yang et al. in 929 patients
               with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma demonstrated similar overall survival of 12.5 months for
                                            [76]
               TARE and 13 months for TACE . However, patient-specific factors such as a history of bilio-enteric
               anastomosis or poor functional status may make TARE the preferred intervention due to decreased
               infection risk and better short-term tolerability.


               The majority of literature on TACE and TARE for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are retrospective in
               design and are limited by potential selection bias or differences in treatment protocols between treatment
               groups. For both interventions, significant variations in chemotherapeutic agents, radio-embolic dosing
               protocols, and operator technique/experience limit the interpretation of the available data and make
               comparison with additional second-line therapeutic options challenging. However, given the promising
               available clinical data for TACE and TARE for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, more
               prospective trials assessing the efficacy of these interventions are highly warranted.

               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to manuscript draft preparation, editing, and submission: An T,
               Wehrenberg-Klee E


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2023.
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137