Page 113 - Read Online
P. 113

Page 14 of 23             Thonglert et al. Hepatoma Res 2023;9:40  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2023.47

               The most recent comprehensive study on the clinical outcomes of MRgRT in primary liver cancer was
                                               [70]
               conducted at Washington University . The study included 99 patients with unresectable primary liver
               cancer (45 with iCCA and 2 with combined HCC-CCA [cHCC/CCA]), who were treated with MRgRT of
               50 Gy in 5 fractions. The PTV margin was defined as a 5 mm expansion from the GTV. Online ART was
               considered for patients who had tumors situated within 2 cm of luminal GI structures. Among patients with
               iCCA or cHCC/CCA, 62% had PTV within 1 cm of the duodenum or small bowel and 53% within 1 cm of
               the stomach. 67% of these patients received online ART. The median follow-up duration was 10.1 months
               for patients with iCCA or cHCC/CCA, and a 2-year cumulative incidence of local progression was 9.0%
               (95%CI: 0.1%-18%). The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 67% (95%CI: 53%-84%) and 31% (95%CI: 17-56),
               respectively. Grade ≥ 3 acute and late complications were found in fewer than 10% of the patients.


               Regarding clinical application, MRgRT may be more beneficial for iCCA patients whose tumors are located
               near GI structures such as the stomach, duodenum, and colon. These organs are relatively radiosensitive
               and are at risk of developing late complications such as bleeding, ulceration, and perforations if exposed to
               high doses of radiation. Furthermore, they exhibit interfraction variations due to peristalsis and organ
               filling. Because MRgRT may be able to address these variations and uncertainties at each delivered fraction,
               escalated doses to the tumor can be more safely delivered. Other scenarios that may potentially benefit from
               MRgRT include patients with significant motion or those who require fiducial marker implantation but are
               unable to undergo the procedure. MRgRT has the potential to provide better soft tissue visualization, real-
               time tumor tracking, and gated treatment in these patients [Figure 2].


               Challenges and limitations of MRgRT in iCCA
               Although MRgRT represents a significant technological advancement in the field of radiotherapy, further
               prospective trials are needed to determine its benefits over CT-guided therapy. MRgRT presents challenges
               in routine clinical implementation, as treatment requires intensive time and resources. The complex
               workflows and extra steps required for online adaptive MRgRT can extend the total treatment time, which
               lasts approximately 50-60 mins per adaptive session [60,71] . The process also requires intensive training and
               coordination of the multidisciplinary team, including radiation therapists, physicists, dosimetrists, and
               physicians [59,60] .


               Additionally, substantial investments are required for MRgRT, including upfront costs of the machinery
               and equipment, staff training, and the longer treatment duration compared to conventional EBRT with
               other types of IGRT . While the treatment cost of MRgRT is higher, there is no data evaluating its cost-
                                [72]
               effectiveness for iCCA patients, especially in relation to its potential efficacy improvement and toxicity
               reduction. Thus, this gap necessitates further research.

               The presence of various artifacts, such as those related to metal and motion, also poses additional technical
               challenges.  Motion artifacts can be more challenging for patients who cannot hold their breath. The limited
               treatment space in MRI-guided machines may lead to difficulty for large patients, those with lateralized
               tumors and individuals experiencing claustrophobia. Furthermore, the physical structure of the machine
               restricts the use of multiple beams from different directions, which can potentially reduce the benefit of
               OAR sparing. Another limitation is that MR-guided machines can track in only one 2D plane, which may
               be insufficient in some case .
                                      [73]

               In terms of clinical application, while MRgRT offers improved visualization of the tumor and daily
               treatment plan adaptation, it may still not be able to achieve safe dose escalation in some iCCA patients,
               such as those with severe cirrhosis or large or multiple tumors. This limitation arises due to MRgRT
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118