Page 90 - Read Online
P. 90

Liu et al. Carbon Footprints 2024;3:20  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cf.2024.27   Page 7 of 8

               enhance their low-carbon transformation efforts, facilitate their integration into the global industrial,
               supply, and value chains, and support Chinese enterprises and brands in expanding globally. In the current
               study, through exploration and analysis of problems Shanghai faces as a megacity in terms of carbon
               footprinting, we have found that the carbon footprint of megacities has a substantial impact on both the
               structure and overall consumption of urban energy, potentially reversing the adjustment in urban and
               industrial structures. Our future research, taking Shanghai as an example, will focus on understanding the
               overarching concept of megacity carbon footprints and the challenges involved, aiming to provide further
               valuable insights for other cities undergoing green transformation.

               DECLARATION
               Authors’ contributions
               Design research, article structure and theme selection: Liu H
               Participation in data collection and literature analysis: Niu Y


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               Both authors have declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2024.

               REFERENCES
               1.       Ahmed Z, Zhang B, Cary M. Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint:
                   Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecol Ind 2021;121:107060.  DOI
               2.       Zheng Y, Yu H, Zhang Y. A bibliometric review on carbon accounting in social science during 1997-2020. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
                   2022;29:9393-407.  DOI
               3.       Xu Ming, He K. Accelerating the construction of China’s product carbon footprint management system. 2024. Available from: https://
                   news.gmw.cn/2024-08/21/content_37511452.htm [Last accessed on 13 Dec 2024].
               4.       Ballouki I, Douimi M, Ouzizi L. A distributed and collaborative model for product design selection considering its supply chain costs
                   and environmental footprint. Int J Syst Sci 2023;10:1958949.  DOI
               5.       Mahapatra SK, Schoenherr T, Jayaram J. An assessment of factors contributing to firms’ carbon footprint reduction efforts. Int J Prod
                   Econ 2021;235:108073.  DOI
               6.       André M, Bourgeois A, Combet E, Lequien M, Pottier A. Challenges in measuring the distribution of carbon footprints: the role of
                   product and price heterogeneity. Ecol Econ 2024;220:108122.  DOI
               7.       Paravantis JA, Tasios PD, Dourmas V, et al. A regression analysis of the carbon footprint of megacities. Sustainability 2021;13:1379.
                   DOI
               8.       Nasab TJ, Monavari SM, Jozi SA, Majedi H. Assessment of carbon footprint in the construction phase of high-rise constructions in
                   Tehran. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2020;17:3153-64.  DOI
               9.       Zheng S, Shan J, Singh RP, et al. High spatio-temporal heterogeneity of carbon footprints in the Zhejiang province, China, from 2005
                   to 2015: implications for climate change policies. Environ Chem Lett 2020;18:931-9.  DOI
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95