Page 52 - Read Online
P. 52

Giuliani et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2021;4:740-4  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2021.14  Page 742


 Table 2. Pharmacological costs and difference in OS with the different treatment regimens of the pivotal phase III RCTs in first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations

 N of   OS   P-  Difference in OS   Median duration of treatment  Costs of   Difference in
 Ref./Trial  Comparative regimens                                                ICER (€)
 patients  (months)  value  (months)  (months)   therapy (€)  costs (€)
 [6]  a  a
 Zhou et al.    Carboplatin + gemcitabine  72  27.2  NS  -4.4  2.4  246  17,576  NA
 OPTIMAL  a
 Erlotinib  82  22.8  12.8                   17,822
 [7]  b  b
 Rosell et al.    Cisplatin +   87  22.1  NS  0.8  2.8  238-222  11,179-11,195   13,974-
 EURTAC  docetaxel/gemcitabine                                                   13,994
 b
 Erlotinib  86  22.9  8.2                    11,417
 [8]  c  c
 Mok et al.    Carboplatin + paclitaxel  129  17.4  NS  1.4  3.4  202  13,818    9870
 IPASS  c
 Gefitinib  132  18.8  6.4                   14,020
 [9]  d  d
 Maemondo et al.    Carboplatin + paclitaxel  110  26.6  NS  1.1  2.8  202  21,923  19,930
 NEJ2002  d
 Gefitinib  114  27.7  10.1                  22,125
 [10]  e  e
 Mitsudomi et al.     Cisplatin + docetaxel  86  37.3  NS  -2.4  2.1  238  11,591  NA
 WJTOG3405  e
 Gefitinib  86  34.9  5.4                    11,829
 [11]
 Han et al.     Cisplatin + gemcitabine  26  22.9  NS  -0.6  4.1  334  11,799    NA
 First-SIGNAL
 Gefitinib  22  22.3  5.4                    11,829
 [12]  f  f
 Sequist et al.     Cisplatin + pemetrexed  111  28.2  NS  0.0  4.1  13,051  30,989  NA
 LUX-Lung 3  f
 Afatinib  229  28.2  11.0                   44,040
 [13]  f  f
 Wu et al.     Cisplatin + gemcitabine  122  23.5  NS  -0.4  2.9  238  52,210    NA
 LUX-Lung 6  f
 Afatinib  242  23.1  13.1                   52,448
 [14]  g  h  h
 Soria et al.     Standard EGFR-TKI  277  31.8  0.046  6.8  11.5  16,012-25,192  66,230-75,410  9740-
 FLAURA  h                                                                       11,090
 Osimertinib  279  38.6  20.7                91,422
 a  [17] b  [18] c  [15] d  [19] e  [20] f  [21] g  h  [16]
 Update on OS  .  Update on OS  .  Update on OS  .  Update on OS  .  Update on OS  . Update on OS  .  Gefitinib or erlotinib.  Update on OS  . RCTs: Randomized controlled trials; EGFR: epidermal growth
 factor receptor; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; N: number; OS: overall survival; ICER: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [expressed as the difference (€) per month - OS gained]; NS: not significant; NA: not
 applicable.



 allow more patients to be treated. This results in “confidential rebates” (i.e., not publicly available), which may hamper access to drugs with a consequent

 overpayment without improving the value of drugs. The extraordinary costs of novel treatments may form a new type of resistance, costs resistance. In several
 countries, this may preclude treatments with these compounds.



 There are several published articles, mostly in China, regarding this topic. However, to our knowledge, this is the first cost-effectiveness analysis of TKIs in
 patients with activating EGFR-mutations in first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC in Europe.
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57