Page 73 - Read Online
P. 73

Page 249                                        Nickoloff et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2021;4:244-63  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2020.89

               Cellular radiosensitivity and radioresistance
               Many physical, biological, and environmental factors influence cell responses to ionizing radiation,
               including those that determine the level and types of damage to cell components; cell state (proliferating
               or quiescent, cell cycle phase); DDR signaling and DNA repair capacity; propensity for programmed
               cell death; cellular “memory” of past adaptive exposure; and tissue macro- and microenvironments. For
               example, RB status influences intrinsic radiosensitivity among individuals [95,96] , and such biomarkers
               can be exploited to personalize radiotherapy treatment planning [97,98] . The physical natures of ionizing
               radiation (photon vs. particle and large vs. small mass/charge) determine lesion spatial distributions,
                                                                                     [99]
               reparability, and cytotoxicity. Nonetheless, as noted by Willers, Xia, and colleagues , “there is no absolute
               resistance to radiation”. If enough radiation can be delivered, all tumor cells will be eradicated regardless
               of environmental, genetic, or metabolic factors. The practical limitation, of course, is collateral damage
               to normal tissue. Hence, any strategy that increases radiation dose to tumors, decreases doses to normal
               tissues, increases tumor-specific cytotoxic effects of radiation, or protects normal tissue from unavoidable
               exposure can improve therapeutic gain and/or reduce side effects.


               Hypoxia
               An important environmental factor that regulates DNA damage induction is oxygen level, which varies
               among tumor types, within different regions of a tumor, and between tumor and normal tissue. Normal
               tissue is well-oxygenated, but tumors are often hypoxic as they struggle to supply oxygen during their
               rapid growth. To a degree, tumors adapt to the hypoxic state, for example, by stabilizing HIF1a, which
               regulates oxygen metabolism and angiogenesis via vascular endothelial growth factor, among other
               effects [100] . Although certain solid tumors are frequently characterized as “hypoxic”, e.g., head and neck and
               pancreatic cancers, it is now clear that most solid tumors have hypoxic regions. The degree of hypoxia is
               regulated by passive oxygen diffusion, creating somewhat stable oxygen gradients across tumor masses,
               and by transient effects such as altered perfusion by tumor vasculature [100] . Given the importance of oxygen
               for ROS production during irradiation (OER), hypoxic regions within tumors are naturally radioresistant;
               this is a particularly vexing problem given that normal (well-oxygenated) tissue may suffer greater ROS
               damage than adjacent tumors, reducing therapeutic gain. Several strategies have been proposed to mitigate
               hypoxia-related radioresistance, including modulation of dose fractionation, inflammatory responses, and
               hypoxia itself [101,102] . For example, investigators have explored hyperbaric oxygen to radiosensitize tumors,
                                                                                                        [3]
               and tourniquets to promote normal tissue radioresistance, but these approaches have fallen out of favor .
               Another idea is to mimic oxygen with agents such as nitroimidazoles, which radiosensitize hypoxic tumors.
               Although these are effective, clinical use has been restricted because of associated neurotoxicity [103,104] .

               CELL PROLIFERATION RATES
               Solid tumors comprise rapidly growing (“bulk”) tumor cells and small numbers of so-called cancer stem
               cells (CSCs). Much of tumor sensitivity to genotoxic chemo- and radiotherapeutics reflects the fact that
               rapidly dividing, bulk tumor cells are more sensitive to DNA damage than most (non-dividing) normal
               cells. CSCs, similar to normal stem cells, divide more slowly than bulk tumor cells, hence CSCs are
               naturally radioresistant. Because CSCs are tumor-initiating cells that support both local tumor growth and
               seed distant metastases, CSC radioresistance is a significant barrier to durable chemo- and radiotherapy
               treatment responses [105-107] . Similar to CSCs, some tumor cells may be quiescent; tumor dormancy is seen
               locally and at metastatic sites, it can be induced by therapy, and it confers radioresistance [108] . Changing
               fractions of bulk, CSC, and quiescent tumor cells may cause regional variations in tumor radioresistance,
               complicating radiotherapy treatment planning.


               Hyperthermia
               The sensitizing effects of hyperthermia have long been investigated in vitro and in pre-clinical models, but
               it has not yet advanced to clinical practice [109] . Hyperthermia alters tissue perfusion to mitigate hypoxia,
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78