Page 50 - Read Online
P. 50

Saliba et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2021;4:125-42                                    Cancer
               DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2020.95                                             Drug Resistance




               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Resistance to venetoclax and hypomethylating
               agents in acute myeloid leukemia



               Antoine N. Saliba , August J. John , Scott H. Kaufmann 1,2,3
                                             2
                              1
               1 Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
               2 Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
               3 Division of Oncology Research, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

               Correspondence to: Dr. Antoine N. Saliba and Scott H. Kaufmann, Division of Oncology Research, Gonda 19-212, Mayo Clinic,
               200 First St., S.W., Rochster, MN 55905, USA. E-mails: Saliba.Antoine@mayo.edu; Kaufmann.Scott@mayo.edu
               How to cite this article:  Saliba AN, John AJ, Kaufmann SH. Resistance to venetoclax and hypomethylating agents in acute
               myeloid leukemia. Cancer Drug Resist 2021;4:125-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2020.95
               Received: 18 Oct 2020    First Decision: 6 Nov 2020    Revised: 12 Nov 2020    Accepted: 16 Nov 2020    Available online: 19 Mar 2021

               Academic Editor: Robert C. A. M. van Waardenburg    Copy Editor: Cai-Hong Wang    Production Editor: Jing Yu



               Abstract
               Despite the success of the combination of venetoclax with the hypomethylating agents (HMA) decitabine or
               azacitidine in inducing remission in older, previously untreated patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML),
               resistance - primary or secondary - still constitutes a significant roadblock in the quest to prolong the duration of
               response. Here we review the proposed and proven mechanisms of resistance to venetoclax monotherapy, HMA
               monotherapy, and the doublet of venetoclax and HMA for the treatment of AML. We approach the mechanisms of
               resistance to HMAs and venetoclax in the light of the agents’ mechanisms of action. We briefly describe potential
               therapeutic strategies to circumvent resistance to this promising combination, including alternative scheduling or
               the addition of other agents to the HMA and venetoclax backbone. Understanding the mechanisms of action and
               evolving resistance in AML remains a priority in order to maximize the benefit from novel drugs and combinations,
               identify new therapeutic targets, define potential prognostic markers, and avoid treatment failure.

               Keywords: Venetoclax, hypomethylating agents, resistance, acute myeloid leukemia, azacitidine, decitabine




               INTRODUCTION
               Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease with diverse molecular profiles, clinical
               outcomes, and disease-specific mortality. In 2020, there will be an estimated 20,000 new cases of AML and
                                                    [1]
               11,200 deaths due to the disease in the U.S. . For decades, the cornerstone of treatment for primary AML


                           © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                    www.cdrjournal.com
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55