Page 126 - Read Online
P. 126

Shek et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2019;2:69-81 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2018.20                                                               Page 77

               Table 2. Summary of SNPs’ influence on cancer treatment with mAbs
                SNP               Gene       Examined drugs       Type of cancer         Consequences
                rs699947 (AA)    VEGF     Bevacizumab (in    Metastatic EGFR-2 negative   Higher treatment response and OS
                                          combination with   breast cancer
                                          paclitaxel)
                rs833061 (TT)    VEGF     Bevacizumab (in    Metastatic colorectal cancer  Reduced PFS
                                          combination with folinic
                                          acid, fluorouracil and
                                          irinotecan)
                rs121913529      KRAS     Bevacizumab        Metastatic colorectal cancer  Reduced PFS and OS
                (KRAS G12A/V)
                rs113488022      BRAF     Cetuximab, Panitumumab  Colorectal cancer  Early lymph node metastasis, lower
                (BRAFV600E)                                                        response
                rs4143815 (CC)   PD-L1    Nivolumab          Non-small cell lung cancer  Higher PFS
                rs4553808 (G)    CTLA-4   Ipilimumab         Metastatic melanoma   Higher response, associated with
                rs11571317 (T)                                                     grade 3-4 immune-related adverse
                rs231775 (A)                                                       events
                rs2282055 (GG)   PD-L1    Nivolumab          Non-small cell lung cancer  Higher median of PFS
                rs396991 (G)     FcgR3A   Trastuzumab        HER-2 positive breast cancer  Higher response rate
                                          Cetuximab          Colorectal cancer,    Increase response rate and PFS
                                          Rituximab          B-cell lymphoma
                rs733618 (G)     CTLA-4   Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab  Metastatic melanoma  Higher response rate
                rs4553808 (G)    CTLA-4   Ipilimumab         Metastatic melanoma   Higher risk of endocrine immune-
                                                                                   related adverse events
                rs733618 (G)     CTLA-4   Ipilimumab         Metastatic melanoma   Higher long-term survival at 3-4
                rs3087243 (G)                                                      years, comparing to heterozygous
                rs17849079 (T)   PIK3CA   Cetuximab, Panitumumab  Metastatic colorectal cancer  Poor objective response rate, lower
                rs7640662 (C)                                                      OS and PFS
               SNPs: single nucleotide polymorphisms; PFS: progression-free survival; OS: overall survival

               rs5742909 (-319C>T, promoter), rs11571316 (-1577G/A), rs11571317 (-658C>T, 5’UTR) and rs3087243
               (CT60G>A, 3’UTR) in 14 patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab or tremelimumab.
                                                                                                       [74]
               It was detected that 83% (5/6) of responders possessed the rs733618 G genetic variant of CTLA-4 gene .
               It was also reported, that all responders had diplotype GG - AA (-1577G/CT60G and -1577A/CT60A). In
               addition, the rs3087243 heterozygous of CTLA-4 gene was correlated with better 5-year survival, compared
               to patients with homozygous genotype (P < 0.001). In this study, all other CTLA-4 SNPs were not statistically
               correlated with response to the treatment or OS . In a more recent study by Queirolo et al. , patients with
                                                                                            [75]
                                                       [74]
               stage IV melanoma, treated by ipilimumab, possessing rs11571316 (-1577G/A) and rs3087243 (CT60G>A)
               homozygous genotypes had better long-term survival at 3 and 4 years, compared to heterozygous (G/
               A) genotypes. Because patients with the homozygous GG genotype possess reduced CTLA-4 mRNA and
                                                                                                     [76]
               protein expression, it was suggested that the efficacy of ipilimumab was increased in these individuals . In
                                                 [77]
               addition, a 2018 study by Queirolo et al. , found that the rs4553808 (-1661G/G) was higher among patients
               with endocrine immune-related adverse events (irAEs) but not cutaneous or gastrointestinal adverse events.

               The future of monoclonal antibody therapies: personalised care?
               Current data suggests that mAbs are effective and specific anticancer drugs, however their efficacy and
               toxicity have demonstrated significant variability due to genotypic differences relating to mAb recognition,
               metabolism and cancer signalling. Consequently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, and
               particularly whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) will prove to be
               invaluable as mAbs become more widely used. While WGS sequences the genome in its entirety (> 95%),
               WES sequences only transcribed regions, and is therefore significantly faster and cheaper. Nonetheless, WGS
               captures significantly more information, as it can identify significant mutations that are not transcribed such
               as promoter regions. As the cost of NGS decreases, usage will increase, thus allowing the identification of the
               full range of somatic mutations present in cancerous and non-cancerous tissue, and allowing physicians to
               decide on the best therapeutic options .
                                               [78]
               A prime example of NGS research into mAb therapies was performed by Rizvi et al. , who performed
                                                                                         [79]
               WES on non-small cell lung cancers treated with pembrolizumab. Paradoxically, a higher number of
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131