Page 14 - Read Online
P. 14

Page 616                                         Laubach et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2023;6:611-41  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2023.60

               mounting evidence that accumulation of lactic acid within T cells dampens their function. Researchers have
                                                               +
               also found that lactate, when studied separately from H  in the form of sodium lactate, induces stemness
                                                                   [45]
               and tumor infiltration, and reduces apoptosis in CD8  T cells . Moreover, sodium lactate supplementation
                                                            +
               in three mouse tumor models showed synergistic effects with anti-PD-1 treatment . A plausible
                                                                                             [45]
               explanation for these somewhat contradictory findings is that variations between the TIMEs of different
               tumor types metabolically reprogram CD8  TILs in distinct ways, wherein some tumors drive increased
                                                    +
               sensitivity of CD8  TILs to lactic acid. Therefore, it is exceedingly important to delineate the metabolic
                               +
               changes in CD8  TILs from different tumor types to identify the most effective therapy.
                            +
               Additional research is needed to tease apart the intricate relationship between lactate, lactic acid, tumor
               cells, CD8  T cells, and immunosuppressive cells. Inhibiting tumor-derived lactic acid production seems to
                        +
               generally have anti-tumor effects, due to the detrimental effects of high acidity on the anti-tumor immune
               cells within the TIME. While lactate ions serve as a carbon source and promote CD8  T cell stemness, they
                                                                                       +
               also benefit immunosuppressive cells and excess amounts can dampen T cell effector functions. Collectively,
               these data demonstrate that tumor-derived alterations in lactic acid metabolism contribute to ICB resistance
               and modulating these pathways may augment efficacy, prompting the need for continued research efforts in
               this field.


               Adenosine
               Adenosine is formed through two major pathways [Figure 1]. In the canonical pathway, ectonucleoside
               triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-1 (CD39) hydrolyzes ATP or ADP to adenosine monophosphate
               (AMP) , which is subsequently converted to adenosine by ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73) . The non-
                                                                                               [47]
                     [46]
               canonical pathway involves the conversion of NAD  to adenosine diphosphate ribose (ADPR) through
                                                             +
               cyclic  ADP  ribose  hydrolase  (CD38);  ADPR  is  then  metabolized  to  AMP  via  ectonucleotide
               pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 1 (CD203a), and finally to adenosine through CD73 . Extracellular
                                                                                            [48]
               adenosine has several fates; it is converted to inosine via adenosine deaminase, converted back to AMP
               through adenosine kinase, or binds to type 1 purinergic receptors, which include A1, A2A, A2B, and A3.
               Both A2A and A2B receptors (A2AR and A2BR) are important for mediating adenosine signaling in
               immune cells within the TIME . High affinity A2AR is more broadly expressed on immune cells, while
                                          [49]
                                                                      [50]
               low affinity A2BR facilitates the expansion of MDSC populations .
               Within the TIME, adenosine formation is predominantly mediated by malignant and immunosuppressive
               cells  and the impact of this metabolite on immunosuppression and cancer progression was recently
                   [51]
                                      [52]
               comprehensively reviewed . Under physiological conditions, extracellular ATP and adenosine levels are
               low . However, during cellular stress, such as hypoxia and nutrient deprivation, intracellular ATP is
                  [53]
               released and serves as a strong pro-inflammatory mediator by recruiting immune cells [53,54] . On the other
               hand, adenosine is a potent immunosuppressive metabolite . As such, it is not surprising that tumor cells
                                                                  [50]
               highly upregulate CD73 and immunosuppressive cells, such as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), Tregs,
               and MDSCs, highly upregulate CD39 to facilitate adenosine accumulation within the TIME [52,55-59] . Further,
               terminally exhausted CD8  T cells exhibit increased CD39 expression, therefore contributing to the elevated
                                     +
               adenosine levels within the TIME , and adenosine drives the expansion of Treg populations .
                                                                                             [61]
                                           [60]
               Tumor-derived adenosine inhibits CD8  T cell functions in a myriad of ways. Adenosine triggers IL-10
                                                  +
               secretion from cervical cancer cells, leading to downregulation of MHC-I expression and subsequent
               immune evasion from CD8  T cells . Increased adenosine production also favors tumor growth, as
                                        +
                                               [62]
               indicated by the negative correlation between CD73 expression and survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma
               human cohorts . Moreover, loss of CD73 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell lines leads to increased
                            [63]
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19