Page 72 - Read Online

Page 375 Ganesan et al. Art Int Surg 2024;4:364-75 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2024.68

34. Ni TF, Wang JL, Chen CK, Shih F, Wang J. Can a prolonged healing pressure injury be benefited by using an AI mattress? A case
study. BMC Geriatr 2024;24:307. DOI PubMed PMC
35. Kalasin S, Sangnuang P, Surareungchai W. Intelligent wearable sensors interconnected with advanced wound dressing bandages for
contactless chronic skin monitoring: artificial intelligence for predicting tissue regeneration. Anal Chem 2022;94:6842-52. DOI
PubMed
36. Topaz M, Lai K, Dowding D, et al. Automated identification of wound information in clinical notes of patients with heart diseases:
developing and validating a natural language processing application. Int J Nurs Stud 2016;64:25-31. DOI PubMed
37. Robnik-Sikonja M, Cukjati D, Kononenko I. Comprehensible evaluation of prognostic factors and prediction of wound healing. Artif
Intell Med 2003;29:25-38. DOI PubMed
38. Ngo QC, Ogrin R, Kumar DK. Computerised prediction of healing for venous leg ulcers. Sci Rep 2022;12:17962. DOI PubMed
PMC
39. Chen CL, Chiang SC, Hung LP, Jhang SJ. Applying AIoT image recognition for prognosis of wound healing in long-term care
residential facility. Wireless Netw 2023. DOI
40. Alderden J, Pepper GA, Wilson A, et al. Predicting pressure injury in critical care patients: a machine-learning model. Am J Crit Care
2018;27:461-8. DOI PubMed PMC
41. Cai JY, Zha ML, Song YP, Chen HL. Predicting the development of surgery-related pressure injury using a machine learning
algorithm model. J Nurs Res 2020;29:e135. DOI PubMed PMC
42. Lee SK, Shin JH, Ahn J, Lee JY, Jang DE. Identifying the risk factors associated with nursing home residents’ pressure ulcers using
machine learning methods. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:2954. DOI PubMed PMC
43. Lustig M, Schwartz D, Bryant R, Gefen A. A machine learning algorithm for early detection of heel deep tissue injuries based on a
daily history of sub-epidermal moisture measurements. Int Wound J 2022;19:1339-48. DOI PubMed PMC
44. Shi L, Wei H, Zhang T, et al. A potent weighted risk model for evaluating the occurrence and severity of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetol
Metab Syndr 2021;13:92. DOI PubMed PMC
45. Nanda R, Nath A, Patel S, Mohapatra E. Machine learning algorithm to evaluate risk factors of diabetic foot ulcers and its severity.
Med Biol Eng Comput 2022;60:2349-57. DOI PubMed
46. Schäfer Z, Mathisen A, Svendsen K, Engberg S, Thomsen TR, Kirketerp-Møller K. Toward machine-learning-based decision support
in diabetes care: a risk stratification study on diabetic foot ulcer and amputation. Front Med 2021;7:601602. DOI PubMed PMC
47. Schäfer Z, Mathisen A, Svendsen K, Engberg S, Rolighed Thomsen T, Kirketerp-Møller K. Toward machine-learning-based decision
support in diabetes care: a risk stratification study on diabetic foot ulcer and amputation. Front Med 2020;7:601602. DOI PubMed
PMC
48. Xie P, Li Y, Deng B, et al. An explainable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital amputation rate of patients with diabetic
foot ulcer. Int Wound J 2022;19:910-8. DOI PubMed PMC
49. Morris MX, Song EY, Rajesh A, Asaad M, Phillips BT. Ethical, legal, and financial considerations of artificial intelligence in surgery.
Am Surg 2023;89:55-60. DOI PubMed
50. World Health Organization. WHO outlines considerations for regulation of artificial intelligence for health. 2023. Available from:
https://www.who.int/news/item/19-10-2023-who-outlines-considerations-for-regulation-of-artificial-intelligence-for-health. [Last
accessed on 2 Nov 2024].
51. Nutifafa Cudjoe A. Ethical implications of artificial intelligence in the healthcare sector. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/
profile/Nutifafa-Amedior/publication/371806117_Ethical_Implications_of_Artificial_Intelligence_in_the_Healthcare_Sector/links/
66659941b769e769192559d4/Ethical-Implications-of-Artificial-Intelligence-in-the-Healthcare-Sector.pdf. [Last accessed on 2 Nov
2024].
52. Sadiq A, Khumalo NP, Bayat A. Chapter 8 Genetics of keloid scarring. In: Textbook on Scar Management: State of the Art
Management and Emerging Technologies [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 61-76. Available from: https:/
/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK586075/. [Last accessed on 2 Nov 2024].
53. Schmieder SJ, Ferrer-Bruker SJ. Hypertrophic scarring. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/
NBK470176/. [Last accessed on 2 Nov 2024].
54. Kim J, Oh I, Lee YN, et al. Predicting the severity of postoperative scars using artificial intelligence based on images and clinical data.
Sci Rep 2023;13:13448. DOI PubMed PMC
55. Chang CP, Lin CJ, Fann WC, Hsieh CH. Identifying necrotizing soft tissue infection using infectious fluid analysis and clinical
parameters based on machine learning algorithms. Heliyon 2024;10:e29578. DOI PubMed PMC
56. Haas R, McGill SC. Artificial intelligence for the prediction of sepsis in adults. In: CADTH Horizon Scan. Available from: https://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK596676/. [Last accessed on 2 Nov 2024].
57. Henry KE, Adams R, Parent C, et al. Factors driving provider adoption of the TREWS machine learning-based early warning system
and its effects on sepsis treatment timing. Nat Med 2022;28:1447-54. DOI PubMed
58. Le DTP, Pham TD. Unveiling the role of artificial intelligence for wound assessment and wound healing prediction. Explor Med
2023;4:589-611. DOI